Audrey Chiang

Audrey Chiang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and medical negligence. Their track record shows a 47.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 31% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Audrey Chiang has demonstrated expertise across 56 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remuneration of Receiver and Manager	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Option to Purchase	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Doctor's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Altered Consent Form	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatric Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maritime Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Memorandum of Understanding	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
On-board Courier Services	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Healthcare Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hospital Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Audrey Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Audrey Chiang has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	8 cases	62% of cases	AXF v Koh Cheng Huat: Dependency Claims, Time-Bar under Civil Law Act(Sep 2015) Hoy Fatt Pte Ltd v Riway: Option to Purchase, HDB Approval, and Rescission(Jan 2015) Yip Man Hing Kevin v Gleneagles Hospital: Judicial Review of Hospital's Disciplinary Decision(Jan 2014)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	2 cases	15% of cases	Hang Huo Investment v Wong Pheng Cheong: Fixing Receiver's Remuneration Under IRDA(Feb 2024) Lim Seng Choon David v Global Maritime: Striking Out Claim Based on Oral Agreement(Aug 2016)
Rodyk & Davidson	1 cases	8% of cases	Lau Chin Eng v Lau Chin Hu: Family Dispute over Company Assets and "Without Prejudice" Privilege(Sep 2009)
Khattar Wong & Partners	1 cases	8% of cases	Colombo Dockyard v. Metro Maritime: Recovery of Funds & Illegality in Contract(Dec 2002)
Khattar Wong & Pnrs	1 cases	8% of cases	Universal Express LLC v Jupiter Air Ltd: Breach of Contract & Non-Competition in Courier Services(Feb 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Audrey Chiang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 4 (31%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	64.5 parties avg	4.5	46%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	8%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Won	74.3 parties avg	4.3	54%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2008	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2009	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2011	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Audrey Chiang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(40%)	40%
Neutral	1(7%)	7%
Partial	1(7%)	7%
Won	7(47%)	47%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	257,500.00	36,785.717 cases	7
USD	649,187.50	649,187.501 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hang Huo Investment v Wong Pheng Cheong: Fixing Receiver's Remuneration Under IRDA 01 Feb 2024 Hang Huo Investment Pte Ltd (Applicant)Partial	01 Feb 2024	Hang Huo Investment Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application allowed in partThe court fixed the amount to be paid by way of remuneration by the Applicant to the Respondent in respect of his appointment as R&M from 11 April 2023 to 26 June 2023 at $725,000. The court ordered that the Respondent account to the Applicant for the amount in excess of the remuneration fixed, viz, for the amount of $633,142.50 (being $1,358,142.50 less $725,000), as well as the GST paid on that amount. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lim Seng Choon David v Global Maritime: Striking Out Claim Based on Oral Agreement 21 Aug 2016 Global Maritime Holdings Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	21 Aug 2016	Global Maritime Holdings Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs awarded to the plaintiff/appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	AXF v Koh Cheng Huat: Dependency Claims, Time-Bar under Civil Law Act 13 Sep 2015 THOMSON MEDICAL PTE LTD (Defendant, Respondent)Won	13 Sep 2015	THOMSON MEDICAL PTE LTD (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $7,500 (excluding disbursements) to be paid by the plaintiffs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Hoy Fatt Pte Ltd v Riway: Option to Purchase, HDB Approval, and Rescission 19 Jan 2015 Riway (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	19 Jan 2015	Riway (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Claim for declaration and return of deposit allowedRiway Singapore’s claim for a declaration that its rescission of the Option was valid and for the return of its deposit was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Yip Man Hing Kevin v Gleneagles Hospital: Judicial Review of Hospital's Disciplinary Decision 23 Jan 2014 Gleneagles Hospital (Respondent)Won	23 Jan 2014	Gleneagles Hospital (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for leave was dismissed and costs were awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Li Siu Lun v Looi Kok Poh: Gleneagles Hospital Conspiracy & Damages Assessment 13 Nov 2013 Gleneagles Hospital (Defendant)Lost	13 Nov 2013	Gleneagles Hospital (Defendant): Interlocutory judgment entered against defendantInterlocutory judgment entered against Gleneagles; compensatory damages of $10,000 and aggravated damages of $240,000 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Li Siu Lun v Looi Kok Poh: Medical Examination Order & Stay Application in Negligence & Breach of Contract Claim 03 May 2012 Gleneagles Hospital (Defendant)Won	03 May 2012	Gleneagles Hospital (Defendant): Application grantedGleneagles' application for a stay pending completion of a psychiatric examination was granted.
8	Lew Kiat Beng v Hiap Seng: Derivative Action & Discovery Obligations 20 Nov 2011 Hiap Seng & Co Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	20 Nov 2011	Hiap Seng & Co Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the Appellants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Lau Chin Eng v Lau Chin Hu: Family Dispute over Company Assets and "Without Prejudice" Privilege 30 Sep 2009 Lau Chin Eng (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Sep 2009	Lau Chin Eng (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedPlaintiffs' appeal was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	K Solutions v NUS: Striking Out for Document Destruction & Discovery Obligations 15 Jun 2009 K Solutions Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	15 Jun 2009	K Solutions Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Claim DismissedK Solutions' claim for wrongful termination was dismissed.
11	Law Chin Eng v Lau Chin Hu: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Fiduciary Duty to Company 29 Oct 2008 Lau Chin Whatt (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Oct 2008	Lau Chin Whatt (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedParagraphs 22 to 28 and prayer 12 of the Statement of Claim were struck out.
12	Colombo Dockyard v. Metro Maritime: Recovery of Funds & Illegality in Contract 06 Dec 2002 Colombo Dockyard Limited (Plaintiff)Won	06 Dec 2002	Colombo Dockyard Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of US$649,187.50, plus interest at 6% per annum from the date of writ until date of judgment. The court also declared that the defendant is holding the said sum of US$649,187.50 upon trust for the plaintiffs.
13	Universal Express LLC v Jupiter Air Ltd: Breach of Contract & Non-Competition in Courier Services 21 Feb 2002 Universal Express LLC (Plaintiff)Won	21 Feb 2002	Universal Express LLC (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).