Audrey Ng

Audrey Ng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in evidence law and judicial management. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Audrey Ng has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in winding up and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Winding Up	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Audrey Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Audrey Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Audrey Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Audrey Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Audrey Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Audrey Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Audrey Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Audrey Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Audrey Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Audrey Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Audrey Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Audrey Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Audrey Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Audrey Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Audrey Ng has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Khattar Wong & Partners	2 cases	67% of cases	Wah Yuen Electrical Engineering v Singapore Cables: Scheme of Arrangement Approval Dispute(Dec 2002) Anthony Wee v UBS AG: Discovery, Banking Act, and Evidence Act in Foreign Exchange Transactions(Sep 2002)
Rajah and Tann	1 cases	33% of cases	Re Bintan Lagoon Resort Ltd: Judicial Management Order Application(Aug 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Audrey Ng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.7
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	67%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Audrey Ng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Neutral	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Bintan Lagoon Resort Ltd: Judicial Management Order Application 18 Aug 2005 Bintan Lagoon Resort Ltd (Respondent)Lost	18 Aug 2005	Bintan Lagoon Resort Ltd (Respondent): Petition dismissedPetition for judicial management order dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Wah Yuen Electrical Engineering v Singapore Cables: Scheme of Arrangement Approval Dispute 09 Dec 2002 Wah Yuen Electrical Engineering Pte Ltd (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	09 Dec 2002	Wah Yuen Electrical Engineering Pte Ltd (Applicant, Appellant): Application dismissed with costsApplication for court approval of the revised Scheme of Arrangement was dismissed with costs.
3	Anthony Wee v UBS AG: Discovery, Banking Act, and Evidence Act in Foreign Exchange Transactions 06 Sep 2002 Citibank NA (Other)Neutral	06 Sep 2002	Citibank NA (Other): NeutralCitibank N.A. was served with the application and represented by counsel at the hearing but did not take part in the arguments.