Augustine Liew

Augustine Liew is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and shipping law. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Augustine Liew has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and admiralty and maritime law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	6 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Seaworthiness	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arrest of Vessel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Letter of Indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Augustine Liew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Augustine Liew has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Haridass Ho & Partners	5 cases	71% of cases	Marina Offshore v China Insurance: Marine Insurance Coverage for Tugboat Loss at Sea(Sep 2006) The Patraikos 2: Cargo Damage Claim - Breach of Hague Rules & Seaworthiness(May 2002) Fortune Hong Kong Trading v Neptra Shipping: Bill of Lading Dispute & Cargo Release(Aug 2001)
Haridass Ho and Partners	2 cases	29% of cases	Marina Offshore v China Insurance: Marine Insurance, Perils of the Sea & Unseaworthiness(Dec 2005) Schaar & Niemeyer v Acrux Shipping: Arrest of Vessel for Failure to Pay, Admiralty Jurisdiction(Sep 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Augustine Liew's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.4 parties avg	2.4	71%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Augustine Liew's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(71%)	71%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	700,000.00	175,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Marina Offshore v China Insurance: Marine Insurance Coverage for Tugboat Loss at Sea 10 Sep 2006 Marina Offshore Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	10 Sep 2006	Marina Offshore Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedJudgment for Marina Offshore in the sum of $420,000 against China Insurance and in the sum of $280,000 against AXA (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Marina Offshore v China Insurance: Marine Insurance, Perils of the Sea & Unseaworthiness 29 Dec 2005 Marina Offshore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Dec 2005	Marina Offshore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for indemnity was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Schaar & Niemeyer v Acrux Shipping: Arrest of Vessel for Failure to Pay, Admiralty Jurisdiction 06 Sep 2004 Acrux Shipping Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	06 Sep 2004	Acrux Shipping Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
4	The Patraikos 2: Cargo Damage Claim - Breach of Hague Rules & Seaworthiness 08 May 2002 Chester Shipping Co Ltd (Defendant)Lost	08 May 2002	Chester Shipping Co Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendants' counterclaim is dismissed with costs. The Lloyd`s Average Bonds/Guarantees furnished by the plaintiffs/their underwriters shall be returned by the defendants together with whatever security for costs previously given by the former. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Fortune Hong Kong Trading v Neptra Shipping: Bill of Lading Dispute & Cargo Release 14 Aug 2001 Neptra Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	14 Aug 2001	Neptra Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the Defendant; the Defendant is entitled to indemnity from the Third Party. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	The Patraikos 2: Cargo Owners v. Ship Owners - Discovery of Documents and Seaworthiness Under Hague Rules 11 May 2000 Ship owners (Defendant)Lost	11 May 2000	Ship owners (Defendant): Appeal dismissedThe defendant's appeal against the order for further and better discovery of documents was dismissed.
7	Precious Wishes Ltd v Sinoble Metalloy: Contempt of Court for Mareva Injunction Breach 09 Jan 2000 Precious Wishes Limited (Plaintiff)Won	09 Jan 2000	Precious Wishes Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the defendants were found guilty of contempt of court.