Aurill Kam

Aurill Kam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in constitutional law and disciplinary proceedings. Their track record shows a 42.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Aurill Kam has demonstrated expertise across 111 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and company law.

Practice AreaCase Volume
Administrative Law7 cases
Company Law6 cases
Contract Law6 cases
Civil Procedure4 cases
Constitutional Law3 cases
Banking and Finance3 cases
Bankruptcy3 cases
Corporate Law2 cases
Winding Up2 cases
Litigation2 cases
International Arbitration2 cases
Insolvency Law2 cases
Arbitration2 cases
Statutory Interpretation2 cases
Property Law2 cases
Judicial Review2 cases
Breach of Contract2 cases
Town Council Law2 cases
Negotiation1 cases
Negligence1 cases
Pleadings1 cases
Summary Judgment1 cases
Injunctions1 cases
Commercial Disputes1 cases
Fraud and Deceit1 cases
Jurisdiction1 cases
Disciplinary Proceedings1 cases
International Commercial Arbitration1 cases
Natural justice1 cases
Anti-suit injunction1 cases
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards1 cases
International Arbitration Act1 cases
Director's Duties1 cases
Costs1 cases
International Commercial Law1 cases
Duty of Candour1 cases
Estoppel1 cases
Statutory Demand1 cases
Trust Law1 cases
Damages1 cases
Companies Act1 cases
Appeal1 cases
Shareholders Rights1 cases
Fiduciary Duty1 cases
Shareholder Rights1 cases
Shareholders’ dispute1 cases
Corporate Insolvency1 cases
Joint Venture Disputes1 cases
Statutory derivative action1 cases
Auditing1 cases
Pre-action discovery1 cases
Breach of director's duties1 cases
Fiduciary relationships1 cases
Winding Up Application1 cases
Joint Venture Law1 cases
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice1 cases
Common law derivative action1 cases
Revisionary Jurisdiction1 cases
Abuse of Trust1 cases
Locus Standi1 cases
Compulsory Acquisition1 cases
Restructuring and Insolvency1 cases
Minority shareholders1 cases
Shareholders Disputes1 cases
Local Government Law1 cases
Restructuring1 cases
Minority Oppression Remedy1 cases
Restraint of Proceedings1 cases
Shareholders Agreements1 cases
Corporate Governance Disputes1 cases
Quasi-partnerships1 cases
Corporate Disputes1 cases
Directors' Liabilities1 cases
Disqualification1 cases
Effect of bankruptcy on directorship1 cases
Presidential Election1 cases
Shareholder Agreements1 cases
Winding Up Proceedings1 cases
Compensation Payable1 cases
Land Acquisition Act1 cases
Valuation of Land1 cases
Derivative Actions1 cases
Oppressive Conduct1 cases
Unfairly Prejudicial Conduct1 cases
Corporate Debt Restructuring1 cases
Shareholding Disputes1 cases
Cross-border disputes1 cases
Corporate Veil1 cases
Shareholder's Loans1 cases
Rectification of Contracts1 cases
E-discovery1 cases
Contingent Liability1 cases
Accountants Liability1 cases
Foreign Exchange Contracts1 cases
Appellate Practice1 cases
Architects and Engineers Liability1 cases
Banking Law1 cases
Business Formation1 cases
Civil Litigation1 cases
Commercial Fraud1 cases
Commercial Law1 cases
Construction Law1 cases
Corporate Litigation1 cases
Corporate Restructuring1 cases
Criminal Law1 cases
Eminent Domain1 cases
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments1 cases
International Law1 cases
Land Law1 cases
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility1 cases
Mediation1 cases

Law Firm Affiliations

Aurill Kam has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Aurill Kam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.6
Complex Cases
2 (17%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost42.0 parties avg
Partial33.2 parties avg
Won52.6 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
200212.0 parties avg
200912.0 parties avg
201022.0 parties avg
201312.0 parties avg
201415.0 parties avg
201522.7 parties avg
201623.3 parties avg
201722.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Aurill Kam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost4(33%)
Partial3(25%)
Won5(42%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD1,000.006 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20021
1
20091
1
20102
2
20131
1
20141
1
20152
11
20162
11
20172
2

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

Case
09 Jul 2017
Attorney-General (Defendant)Won
06 Jul 2017
Attorney-General (Defendant)Won
27 Oct 2016
Attorney-General (Appellant)Partial
10 Mar 2016
The Collector of Land Revenue (Respondent)Won
26 Nov 2015
Attorney-General (Appellant)Partial
26 May 2015
The Attorney-General (Plaintiff)Lost
15 May 2014
Attorney-General (Appellant)Won
30 Oct 2013
Attorney-General (Respondent)Won
28 Dec 2010
PricewaterhouseCoopers (Defendant, Respondent)Lost
24 May 2010
Choy Chee Yean (Respondent)Lost
08 Mar 2009
BNP Paribas (Appellant)Lost
12 May 2002
WSG Nimbus Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial