Aveline Chan

Aveline Chan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in corporate restructuring and schemes of arrangement. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Aveline Chan has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Aveline Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aveline Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aveline Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Aveline Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Aveline Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aveline Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aveline Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Debt Restructuring	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Aveline Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Reverse Dutch Auction	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aveline Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Aveline Chan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
David Lim & Partners	1 cases	100% of cases	RBS v TT International: Scheme of Arrangement - Creditor Classification, Voting Rights, Scheme Manager Duties(Jan 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Aveline Chan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Aveline Chan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	RBS v TT International: Scheme of Arrangement - Creditor Classification, Voting Rights, Scheme Manager Duties 30 Jan 2012 Ho Lee Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	30 Jan 2012	Ho Lee Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs of appeal and the hearing below to both appellants.