Aw Wen Ni

Aw Wen Ni is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 17 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and bankruptcy. Their track record shows a 47.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated expertise across 62 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	12 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inherent Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Verbal Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Permission to continue proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts for sale and supply of goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common law derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery Obligations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Products	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private Banking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accumulators	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Validity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Aw Wen Ni has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Aw Wen Ni has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 15 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	15 cases	88% of cases	XBW v XBX: Probate Dispute over Lost Will and Interim Administration of Estate(Aug 2024) Kho Choon Keng v Lian Keng Enterprises: Winding Up, Quasi-Partnership, Legitimate Expectations, Mutual Trust(Jul 2024) Ang Hong Wei v Ang Teng Hai: Summary Judgment, Verbal Agreements & Property Sale(Jan 2024)
Wong Partnership LLP	2 cases	12% of cases	DBS Bank v Yamazaki Mazak: Tort of Deceit & Summary Judgment in Loan Disbursement Dispute(Oct 2008) CIMB Bank v Dresdner Kleinwort: Forum Non Conveniens & Choice of Law in Restitution Claim(Aug 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Aw Wen Ni's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 5 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.7 parties avg	2.7	35%
Partial	34.3 parties avg	4.3	18%
Won	83.3 parties avg	3.3	47%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2015	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	34.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Aw Wen Ni's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(35%)	35%
Partial	3(18%)	18%
Won	8(47%)	47%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	25,500.00	3,187.508 cases	8
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 17 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	XBW v XBX: Probate Dispute over Lost Will and Interim Administration of Estate 29 Aug 2024 XBX (Defendant)Lost	29 Aug 2024	XBX (Defendant): Order granted in terms of Originating Summons (Probate) No 11 of 2023Order granted in terms of Originating Summons (Probate) No 11 of 2023 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Kho Choon Keng v Lian Keng Enterprises: Winding Up, Quasi-Partnership, Legitimate Expectations, Mutual Trust 25 Jul 2024 Kho Choon Keng (Claimant)Partial	25 Jul 2024	Kho Choon Keng (Claimant): Winding up order granted, stayed for 30 days.Winding up order granted, stayed for 30 days to allow parties to reach a compromise. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ang Hong Wei v Ang Teng Hai: Summary Judgment, Verbal Agreements & Property Sale 18 Jan 2024 Ang Teng Hai (Defendant)Partial	18 Jan 2024	Ang Teng Hai (Defendant): Leave to Defend Granted ConditionallyLeave to defend granted for the balance of the claim of $387,800, conditional on providing a banker’s guarantee or a solicitor’s undertaking for the sum of $153,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Wang Aifeng v Sunmax Global Capital: Permission to Continue Proceedings Against Bankrupt Director 31 Oct 2022 Wang Aifeng (Plaintiff, Applicant)Won	31 Oct 2022	Wang Aifeng (Plaintiff, Applicant): Application GrantedPermission granted to continue proceedings in Suit 1175 against the second defendant.
5	Shandong Qixia v Yong Zeng Yuan: Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duties 06 Mar 2022 Yong Zeng Yuan Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Lost	06 Mar 2022	Yong Zeng Yuan Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaims dismissed.
6	The King's Challenge Pte Ltd v Baer-Richner: Service Out of Jurisdiction and Breach of Contract 28 Oct 2021 Baer-Richner, Gabriele (Defendant)Won	28 Oct 2021	Baer-Richner, Gabriele (Defendant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; the court will hear costs at a later date if parties are unable to agree costs.
7	Hou Chao v Gu Xiaolan: Striking Out, Common Law Derivative Action 15 Sep 2020 Gu Xiaolan (Defendant)Won	15 Sep 2020	Gu Xiaolan (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; costs awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Zillion Global v Deutsche Bank: Breach of Contract, Negligence, and Misrepresentation in Wealth Management 11 Jul 2019 Deutsche Bank AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant)Won	11 Jul 2019	Deutsche Bank AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant.
9	Chan Siew Lee Jannie v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group: Bankruptcy & Statutory Demands 05 Apr 2016 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (Respondent)Won	05 Apr 2016	Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $20,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be paid by the Appellant to the Respondent.
10	Chan Siew Lee Jannie v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd: Setting Aside Statutory Demand 14 Jun 2015 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (Defendant)Won	14 Jun 2015	Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the Defendant; Plaintiff to pay costs of $3000 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Undue Influence, and Appointment of Deputies 18 May 2015 Re BKR (Respondent)Lost	18 May 2015	Re BKR (Respondent): Finding of Lack of CapacityCourt found that BKR lacked the capacity to make decisions regarding her property and affairs due to a combination of mental impairment and undue influence.
12	Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Appointment of Deputies, Undue Influence 30 Sep 2013 BKR (Appellant, Defendant)Won	30 Sep 2013	BKR (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; original decision set aside; costs reversed in appellant's favor (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Unauthorized Equity Accumulators & Bank's Discovery Obligations 16 May 2013 Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Respondent)Lost	16 May 2013	Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Respondent): Claims dismissedThe Bank’s claims against Teo are dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Dispute over Unauthorized Accumulator Trades 10 Apr 2011 Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Respondent)Lost	10 Apr 2011	Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Respondent): Judgment Set AsideThe judgment in favor of Crédit Industriel et Commercial was set aside, and a new trial was ordered.
15	DBS Bank v Yamazaki Mazak: Discovery & Particulars Dispute on Loan Default & Misrepresentation 20 Jul 2010 Yamazaki Mazak Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant, Respondent)Partial	20 Jul 2010	Yamazaki Mazak Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant, Respondent): Appeal partially allowed and partially dismissedYamazaki's appeal was partially successful. Its appeal in respect of categories (a), (c) – (e), and (h) was dismissed, but its appeal for category (b) was allowed. Yamazaki’s appeal against the AR’s order in its application for discovery and further and better particulars was dismissed.
16	DBS Bank v Yamazaki Mazak: Tort of Deceit & Summary Judgment in Loan Disbursement Dispute 20 Oct 2008 Yamazaki Mazak Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	20 Oct 2008	Yamazaki Mazak Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Unconditional leave to defend grantedUnconditional leave to defend granted to the 1st defendant. Costs of $2,500 awarded to the 1st defendant for RA 110. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	CIMB Bank v Dresdner Kleinwort: Forum Non Conveniens & Choice of Law in Restitution Claim 07 Aug 2008 CIMB Bank Bhd (Appellant)Lost	07 Aug 2008	CIMB Bank Bhd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedCIMB's appeal against the High Court's decision was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.