Azmin Jailani

Azmin Jailani is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and international arbitration act. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Azmin Jailani has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in commercial disputes and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	20% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Azmin Jailani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	20% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Azmin Jailani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	20% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Azmin Jailani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Azmin Jailani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Azmin Jailani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Azmin Jailani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Azmin Jailani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Azmin Jailani has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Singapore Salvage Engineers v. North Sea Drilling: Agency & Authority in Construction of Contract(Jan 2016) PT Central Investindo v Franciscus Wongso: Challenge to Arbitrator's Impartiality and Setting Aside of Award(Sep 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Azmin Jailani's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Azmin Jailani's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	414,600.00	207,300.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Singapore Salvage Engineers v. North Sea Drilling: Agency & Authority in Construction of Contract 11 Jan 2016 North Sea Drilling Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	11 Jan 2016	North Sea Drilling Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff S$414,600 plus interest. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	PT Central Investindo v Franciscus Wongso: Challenge to Arbitrator's Impartiality and Setting Aside of Award 29 Sep 2014 Franciscus Wongso (Respondent)Won	29 Sep 2014	Franciscus Wongso (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment in favor of respondent; application to remove arbitrator and set aside award dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).