B M Singh

B M Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and company law. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

B M Singh has demonstrated expertise across 42 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of duty and accounting irregularities.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Duty	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Accounting Irregularities	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvent Trading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Disclosure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Conveyance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation of Funds	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Auditing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidators	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Provisional liquidators	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Veil	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	B M Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

B M Singh has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Engelin Teh & Partners	2 cases	100% of cases	Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd v Tong Tien See: Director's Breach of Duty and Conspiracy to Defraud Creditors(Dec 2001) Tong Tien See Construction v Tong Tien See: Breach of Director's Duties & Shadow Director Liability(Dec 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of B M Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 14.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	214.0 parties avg	14.0	100%
Lost	214.0 parties avg	14.0	100%
Won	114.0 parties avg	14.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	214.0 parties avg	14.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of B M Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	2(40%)	40%
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	444,339,598.40	222,169,799.202 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	5 221	Dismissed: 2 cases (40.0%) Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd v Tong Tien See: Director's Breach of Duty and Conspiracy to Defraud Creditors 30 Dec 2001 Tong Tien See (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	30 Dec 2001	Tong Tien See (Defendant, Appellant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the First Defendant for the loss/damage suffered by the Plaintiff company by reason of the conspiracy to injure by unlawful means in the sum of $53.3 million. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tong Tien See Construction v Tong Tien See: Breach of Director's Duties & Shadow Director Liability 30 Dec 2001 Tong Tien See (Defendant)Lost	30 Dec 2001	Tong Tien See (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the first defendant for $53.3 million due to conspiracy to injure by unlawful means and breaches of fiduciary duty. Declaration that the first defendant was knowingly a party to the carrying on of the business of the plaintiff company with intent to defraud its creditors and that they were liable to the plaintiff company for the said $53.3m. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).