B Uthayachanran

B Uthayachanran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and criminal law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

B Uthayachanran has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in misuse of drugs act and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Solicitors' Accounts Rules	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Remuneration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gross overcharging	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Societies Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Lawyers)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of fidelity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rules of Association	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chain of Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	B Uthayachanran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

B Uthayachanran has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Essex LLC	6 cases	86% of cases	Law Society v Dhanwant Singh: Disciplinary Proceedings for Breach of Conveyancing Rules(Dec 2019) Mohd Akebal v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2019) Public Prosecutor v Ramdhan bin Lajis: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2018)
B Uthayachanran & Co	1 cases	14% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Chen Mingjian: Trafficking in Controlled Drugs & Presumption from Possession(Sep 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of B Uthayachanran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.6 parties avg	2.6	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of B Uthayachanran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	50,000.00	16,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Law Society v Dhanwant Singh: Disciplinary Proceedings for Breach of Conveyancing Rules 19 Dec 2019 Dhanwant Singh (Respondent)Lost	19 Dec 2019	Dhanwant Singh (Respondent): Fine ImposedThe court imposed a fine of $50,000 on the Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Mohd Akebal v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Nov 2019 Mohd Akebal s/o Ghulam Jilani (Appellant)Lost	27 Nov 2019	Mohd Akebal s/o Ghulam Jilani (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
3	Public Prosecutor v Ramdhan bin Lajis: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Apr 2018 Ramdhan bin Lajis (Defendant)Lost	26 Apr 2018	Ramdhan bin Lajis (Defendant): Guilty verdict
4	Law Society v. Udeh Kumar: Disciplinary Proceedings for Breach of Professional Conduct 26 Jun 2017 UDEH KUMAR S/O SETHURAJU (Respondent)Lost	26 Jun 2017	UDEH KUMAR S/O SETHURAJU (Respondent): Struck off the roll of advocates and solicitorsUdeh Kumar was ordered to be struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors and to pay costs (including disbursements) to the Law Society in each of the Originating Summonses and the two hearings before the Tribunal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Law Society v Ang Chin Peng: Disciplinary Action for Gross Overcharging in Estate Matters 25 Nov 2012 DeCruz Martin Francis (Respondent)Lost	25 Nov 2012	DeCruz Martin Francis (Respondent): SuspensionSuspended for three months and ordered to pay costs.
6	Phua Kiah Mai v Foo Jong Peng: Challenge to Removal of Association Leaders 18 Jan 2012 Foo Jong Peng (Defendant)Lost	18 Jan 2012	Foo Jong Peng (Defendant): Applications dismissedThe plaintiffs' applications in this Originating Summons are allowed against the defendants.
7	Public Prosecutor v Chen Mingjian: Trafficking in Controlled Drugs & Presumption from Possession 15 Sep 2009 Chen Mingjian (Defendant)Lost	15 Sep 2009	Chen Mingjian (Defendant): Sentenced to deathThe accused was sentenced to death.