Balagopal P

Balagopal P is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judgments and orders. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Balagopal P has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Balagopal P has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Balagopal P has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Balagopal P has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Balagopal P has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Balagopal P has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Balagopal P has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Balagopal P has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Balagopal P has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Balagopal P has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Balagopal P has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
M P Kanisan and Partners	1 cases	100% of cases	Subramaniam v Sagadevan: Accounting Dispute Among Siblings Over Property Development and Sale Proceeds(Apr 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Balagopal P's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Balagopal P's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	247,896.46	247,896.461 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Subramaniam v Sagadevan: Accounting Dispute Among Siblings Over Property Development and Sale Proceeds 11 Apr 2004 Sagadevan s/o Gurusamy (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	11 Apr 2004	Sagadevan s/o Gurusamy (Defendant, Respondent): Assistant registrar's order variedThe first defendant will remain liable for $247,896.46 to all seven siblings, including himself (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).