Belinder Kaur Nijar

Belinder Kaur Nijar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal ethics and professional responsibility and work injury compensation. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and costs.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	4 cases	16% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Joint and Several Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Order of medical examination	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Risk Assessment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Belinder Kaur Nijar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Belinder Kaur Nijar has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hoh Law Corporation	4 cases	100% of cases	Xie Weiwei v Long Hui Construction: Appeal on Order for Medical Examination in Personal Injury Claim(Aug 2018) Chong Kim Beng v Lim Ka Poh: Joint Liability & Negligence in Workplace Injury(Apr 2015) Lam Hwa Engineering v Yang Qiang: Recovery of Travel Expenses as Disbursements in Personal Injury Claim(Jan 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Belinder Kaur Nijar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.7 parties avg	4.7	50%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Belinder Kaur Nijar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,208.00	604.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Xie Weiwei v Long Hui Construction: Appeal on Order for Medical Examination in Personal Injury Claim 26 Aug 2018 Gao Weiqiang (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	26 Aug 2018	Gao Weiqiang (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of DJ Seah was dismissed.
2	Chong Kim Beng v Lim Ka Poh: Joint Liability & Negligence in Workplace Injury 05 Apr 2015 Chong Kim Beng (Appellant)Lost	05 Apr 2015	Chong Kim Beng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; each side to bear his/its own costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Lam Hwa Engineering v Yang Qiang: Recovery of Travel Expenses as Disbursements in Personal Injury Claim 13 Jan 2014 Yang Qiang (Respondent)Won	13 Jan 2014	Yang Qiang (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe respondent's claim for travel expenses was upheld, and the appellant was ordered to pay costs.
4	Lam Hwa Engineering v Yang Qiang: Recovery of Travel Expenses for Foreign Litigant 19 Feb 2013 Yang Qiang (Respondent)Won	19 Feb 2013	Yang Qiang (Respondent): Entitled to Recover Travel ExpensesRespondent is entitled to recover his travel expenses reasonably incurred in the sum of $1,208. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.