Benedict Chan Wei Qi

Benedict Chan Wei Qi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Benedict Chan Wei Qi has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	19% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Benedict Chan Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 19% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Benedict Chan Wei Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Benedict Chan Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benedict Chan Wei Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benedict Chan Wei Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Benedict Chan Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Benedict Chan Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benedict Chan Wei Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Benedict Chan Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benedict Chan Wei Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benedict Chan Wei Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Chain of Custody	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Benedict Chan Wei Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Benedict Chan Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Benedict Chan Wei Qi has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	5 cases	100% of cases	PP v Lim Wei Fong Nicman: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Duress Defense(Jan 2024) Public Prosecutor v. Mustaqim bin Abdul Kadir: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2023) Public Prosecutor v Munusamy Ramarmurth: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Benedict Chan Wei Qi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	52.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Benedict Chan Wei Qi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	5(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Lim Wei Fong Nicman: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Duress Defense 09 Jan 2024 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	09 Jan 2024	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe Prosecution successfully proved the charge against Mr. Lim beyond a reasonable doubt.
2	Public Prosecutor v. Mustaqim bin Abdul Kadir: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 15 May 2023 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	15 May 2023	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Prosecution successfully proved the charge against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
3	Public Prosecutor v Munusamy Ramarmurth: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 14 Nov 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	14 Nov 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionAccused convicted on the charge of drug trafficking.
4	Public Prosecutor v Ramendra Krishnan: Trafficking and Possession of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Oct 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	24 Oct 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Successful ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor successfully prosecuted Ramendra Krishnan on charges related to drug trafficking and possession.
5	Public Prosecutor v Siow Kai Yuan Terence: Sentencing for Outrage of Modesty on Public Transport 26 Apr 2020 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	26 Apr 2020	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the respondent was sentenced to two weeks imprisonment.