Benedict Tan

Benedict Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and winding up. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Benedict Tan has demonstrated expertise across 42 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Detinue	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Express Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Exclusion Clauses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breaches of directors’ duties of care and skill	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benedict Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Benedict Tan has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Essex LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Nambu PVD Pte Ltd v UBTS Pte Ltd: Negligence, Bailment, Contractual Exclusion Clauses & Fire Damage(Feb 2021)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Bharat Forge v Bombardier: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Aircraft Maintenance(Jul 2022)
Goodwins Law Corporation	1 cases	25% of cases	Icadam Technologies v CAD-IT: Defamation in Metal Stamping Software Industry(Jul 2005)
Hee Theng Fong & Co	1 cases	25% of cases	Pang Yong Hock v PKS Contracts Services: Derivative Action & Directors' Duties(Sep 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Benedict Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Benedict Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	248,240.00	124,120.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bharat Forge v Bombardier: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Aircraft Maintenance 28 Jul 2022 Bombardier Aerospace Services Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 Jul 2022	Bombardier Aerospace Services Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claims dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
2	Nambu PVD Pte Ltd v UBTS Pte Ltd: Negligence, Bailment, Contractual Exclusion Clauses & Fire Damage 01 Feb 2021 Nambu PVD Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	01 Feb 2021	Nambu PVD Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $248,240.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Icadam Technologies v CAD-IT: Defamation in Metal Stamping Software Industry 20 Jul 2005 CAD-IT Consultants (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	20 Jul 2005	CAD-IT Consultants (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Pang Yong Hock v PKS Contracts Services: Derivative Action & Directors' Duties 01 Sep 2003 PKS Contracts Services Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	01 Sep 2003	PKS Contracts Services Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedThe application for leave to commence proceedings in the name of the company was dismissed.