Benedict Teo Chun-Wei

Benedict Teo Chun-Wei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and costs. Their track record shows a 83.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Lodgment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Right of first refusal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formalities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Benedict Teo Chun-Wei has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	6 cases	100% of cases	ABN AMRO v 1050 Capital: Summary Judgment & Liquidation of Trading Portfolio(Oct 2015) Telemedia v Credit Agricole: Contractual Indemnity and Third-Party Costs(Jul 2015) Telemedia v Credit Agricole: Breach of Mandate & Duty of Care in Share Transfer Dispute(Nov 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Benedict Teo Chun-Wei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Other	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	52.6 parties avg	2.6	83%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Benedict Teo Chun-Wei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Other	1(17%)	17%
Won	5(83%)	83%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	935,526.39	467,763.202 cases	2
USD	569,109.00	569,109.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Other: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ABN AMRO v 1050 Capital: Summary Judgment & Liquidation of Trading Portfolio 19 Oct 2015 ABN AMRO CLEARING BANK NV (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	19 Oct 2015	ABN AMRO CLEARING BANK NV (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed; judgment for the plaintiff.Appeal allowed; final judgment entered against the defendant for S$935,526.39 with interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Telemedia v Credit Agricole: Contractual Indemnity and Third-Party Costs 02 Jul 2015 Credit Agricole (Suisse) SA (Defendant)Won	02 Jul 2015	Credit Agricole (Suisse) SA (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of Credit Agricole; Telemedia to pay Credit Agricole's costs on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Telemedia v Credit Agricole: Breach of Mandate & Duty of Care in Share Transfer Dispute 17 Nov 2014 Credit Agricole (Suisse) SA (Defendant)Won	17 Nov 2014	Credit Agricole (Suisse) SA (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment was given in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
4	Telemedia Pacific Group v Credit Agricole: Breach of Mandate & Authority of Signatory 18 Feb 2013 Credit Agricole (Suisse) SA (Defendant)Other	18 Feb 2013	Credit Agricole (Suisse) SA (Defendant): OtherThe outcome for the defendant is not explicitly stated in the judgment extract.
5	RBS Coutts Bank v Kothari: Summary Judgment & Conclusive Evidence Clauses in Forex Trading Dispute 02 Dec 2009 RBS Coutts Bank Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	02 Dec 2009	RBS Coutts Bank Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of USD 569,109 with interest.
6	Ho Seek Yueng Novel v J & V Development: Oral Loan & Right of First Refusal Dispute 17 Apr 2006 J & V Development Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Apr 2006	J & V Development Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment was granted in favor of the defendant.