Benedict Teong

Benedict Teong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Benedict Teong has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Preventive detention	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Snatch Theft	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Benedict Teong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Benedict Teong has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	75% of cases	PP v Muhammad Hanafi & Mohamed Nagib: Trafficking Diamorphine & Cannabis(Dec 2024) Sheik Parvez v Public Prosecutor: Driving Under Disqualification & Without Insurance(Jun 2022) Kuah Teck Hin v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Preventive Detention for Snatch Theft(May 2022)
Tan Rajah & Cheah	1 cases	25% of cases	World Fuel Services v Xie Sheng Guo: Restraint of Trade and Confidentiality in Aviation Oil Supply(Mar 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Benedict Teong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Benedict Teong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Muhammad Hanafi & Mohamed Nagib: Trafficking Diamorphine & Cannabis 15 Dec 2024 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	15 Dec 2024	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionDefendants convicted on all charges.
2	Sheik Parvez v Public Prosecutor: Driving Under Disqualification & Without Insurance 14 Jun 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	14 Jun 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedSuccessfully defended the appeal against sentences and disqualification orders.
3	Kuah Teck Hin v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Preventive Detention for Snatch Theft 19 May 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 May 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
4	World Fuel Services v Xie Sheng Guo: Restraint of Trade and Confidentiality in Aviation Oil Supply 04 Mar 2019 Xie Sheng Guo (Defendant)Lost	04 Mar 2019	Xie Sheng Guo (Defendant): Application dismissed against defendantThe application to prevent the defendant from commencing employment was allowed, meaning the defendant lost. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.