Benjamin Tan

Benjamin Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and international arbitration act. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Benjamin Tan has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and asset recovery.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Benjamin Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benjamin Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benjamin Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Benjamin Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benjamin Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Benjamin Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Benjamin Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benjamin Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Benjamin Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Haridass Ho & Partners	1 cases	100% of cases	Sanum Investments v ST Group: Enforcement of Arbitral Award & Tribunal Jurisdiction(Jun 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Benjamin Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	100%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Benjamin Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sanum Investments v ST Group: Enforcement of Arbitral Award & Tribunal Jurisdiction 17 Jun 2018 ST Vegas Enterprise Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Jun 2018	ST Vegas Enterprise Ltd (Defendant): WonSummons allowed for S.T. Vegas Enterprise Ltd.