Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong

Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and judicial review. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Charitable Trust	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Auditing Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Accountants Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Tiered Dispute Resolution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	CSY v CSZ: Stay of Court Proceedings & Court's Discretion Under Arbitration Act(May 2022)
Breakpoint LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Arif Rahim Valibhoy v Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura: Judicial Review of Trustee Removal(Nov 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Benjamin Tan Zhi Xiong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Arif Rahim Valibhoy v Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura: Judicial Review of Trustee Removal 30 Nov 2023 Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura (Respondent)Neutral	30 Nov 2023	Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura (Respondent): Order to allow OETs to give evidence and make submissions on the severability of the Removal Decision as well as the Costs DecisionMUIS was ordered to allow OETs to give evidence and make submissions on the severability of the Removal Decision as well as the Costs Decision, including but not limited to contesting the Applicant’s position that the quashing of the Removal Decision and Costs Decision could and should only be limited to him to the exclusion of the OETs.
2	CSY v CSZ: Stay of Court Proceedings & Court's Discretion Under Arbitration Act 18 May 2022 CSY (Appellant)Won	18 May 2022	CSY (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the decision of the High Court to stay the FY2018 and FY2019 Dispute in favour of arbitration was overturned.