Bernice Tan Huilin

Bernice Tan Huilin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and passing off. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Bernice Tan Huilin has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and trademarks.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bernice Tan Huilin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Bernice Tan Huilin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bernice Tan Huilin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bernice Tan Huilin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bernice Tan Huilin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bernice Tan Huilin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Bernice Tan Huilin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bernice Tan Huilin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Bernice Tan Huilin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Disclosure Order	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bernice Tan Huilin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Bernice Tan Huilin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Monex Group v E-Clearing: Committal Order for Failure to Comply with Disclosure Order(Sep 2012)
Harry Elias Partnership	1 cases	50% of cases	Chong Peter v Triple 8 Enterprise: Trade Mark Infringement & Passing Off in KTV Industry(Jan 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Bernice Tan Huilin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Bernice Tan Huilin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Monex Group v E-Clearing: Committal Order for Failure to Comply with Disclosure Order 13 Sep 2012 E-Clearing (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	13 Sep 2012	E-Clearing (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Committal order granted but suspendedCommittal order granted but suspended. The respondent was given 30 days to purge his contempt by supplying the required documents. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
2	Chong Peter v Triple 8 Enterprise: Trade Mark Infringement & Passing Off in KTV Industry 10 Jan 2010 Triple 8 Enterprise Pte Ltd (trading as Mirage Deluxe KTV & Nightclub) (Defendant)Won	10 Jan 2010	Triple 8 Enterprise Pte Ltd (trading as Mirage Deluxe KTV & Nightclub) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.