Bertrice Hsu

Bertrice Hsu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fraud and deceit and conspiracy by unlawful means. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Bertrice Hsu has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Bertrice Hsu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Bertrice Hsu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bertrice Hsu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bertrice Hsu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Bertrice Hsu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Bertrice Hsu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bertrice Hsu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Housing Loans	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bertrice Hsu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Furniture Rebate Plan	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bertrice Hsu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Bertrice Hsu has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 cases	100% of cases	UOB v Lippo Marina: Deceit & Conspiracy in Housing Loans for Marina Collection Units(Dec 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Bertrice Hsu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Bertrice Hsu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	UOB v Lippo Marina: Deceit & Conspiracy in Housing Loans for Marina Collection Units 07 Dec 2021 United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff)Partial	07 Dec 2021	United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff): Claims against the first defendant dismissed; claims against the second and third defendants succeed.Claims against the first defendant, Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd, were dismissed. Claims against the second and third defendants, Goh Buck Lim and Aurellia Adrianus Ho, succeeded. Damages arising from the successful claims in deceit against them remain to be assessed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)