Beulah Li Sile

Beulah Li Sile is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in protection from online falsehoods and manipulation act (pofma) and false imprisonment. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and constitutional law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice19% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA)	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
False Imprisonment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Assault and Battery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Public Interest Immunity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Beulah Li Sile has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Beulah Li Sile has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	100% of cases	Mah Kiat Seng v Attorney-General: False Imprisonment & Statutory Interpretation of Mental Health Act(Jan 2023) Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA Appeal & Correction Direction(Jul 2022) Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA, Statutory Interpretation & Online Falsehoods(May 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Beulah Li Sile's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Beulah Li Sile's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	33,000.00	11,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mah Kiat Seng v Attorney-General: False Imprisonment & Statutory Interpretation of Mental Health Act 18 Jan 2023 Tan Thiam Chin Lawrence (Defendant)Won	18 Jan 2023	Tan Thiam Chin Lawrence (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against Tan Thiam Chin Lawrence was dismissed.
2	Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA Appeal & Correction Direction 24 Jul 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	24 Jul 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent): Costs awardedCosts of $6,000 awarded to the Attorney-General, to be paid by the Singapore Democratic Party. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA, Statutory Interpretation & Online Falsehoods 09 May 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	09 May 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent): Costs AwardedThe Attorney-General was awarded costs of $7,000 and reasonable disbursements to be fixed by the court if not agreed between the parties, to be paid by the Singapore Democratic Party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Mah Kiat Seng v Attorney-General: Discovery, Evidence Act s 126, Public Interest Immunity 26 Aug 2021 Tan Thiam Chin Lawrence (Defendant)Neutral	26 Aug 2021	Tan Thiam Chin Lawrence (Defendant): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party.