Bhaskaran Sivasamy

Bhaskaran Sivasamy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in refund guarantees and civil practice. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and refund guarantees.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Refund Guarantees	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Trade	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance Bonds	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Submission to Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
New Demand	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Initial Demand	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Deferred Demand	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bhaskaran Sivasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Bhaskaran Sivasamy has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
M&A Law Corporation	3 cases	60% of cases	Master Marine AS v Labroy Offshore Ltd: Refund Guarantees & Shipbuilding Contract Dispute(Apr 2012) Labroy Offshore v Master Marine: Injunction against Refund Guarantee Payment Dispute(Oct 2011) Faber Image Media v Patrician Holdings: Sub-Tenancy Dispute Over Boat Quay Premises(Jan 2009)
M & A Law Corporation	2 cases	40% of cases	Credit Suisse v Lim Soon Fang Bryan: Examination of Witnesses in Foreign Jurisdiction(Apr 2007) PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia v Dexia Bank: Setting Aside Arbitral Award & Public Policy(Nov 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Bhaskaran Sivasamy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.0 parties avg	3.0	80%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2012	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Bhaskaran Sivasamy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Master Marine AS v Labroy Offshore Ltd: Refund Guarantees & Shipbuilding Contract Dispute 17 Apr 2012 Labroy Offshore Ltd (Respondent)Lost	17 Apr 2012	Labroy Offshore Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, injunction restraining the Banks from making payment to Master Marine AS under the New Demand discharged. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Labroy Offshore v Master Marine: Injunction against Refund Guarantee Payment Dispute 26 Oct 2011 Labroy Offshore Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	26 Oct 2011	Labroy Offshore Ltd (Plaintiff): Injunction GrantedInjunction granted to restrain Master Marine AS from receiving payment from the Banks on the basis of its New Demands.
3	Faber Image Media v Patrician Holdings: Sub-Tenancy Dispute Over Boat Quay Premises 12 Jan 2009 Faber Image Media Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Jan 2009	Faber Image Media Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim dismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of sublease was dismissed.
4	Credit Suisse v Lim Soon Fang Bryan: Examination of Witnesses in Foreign Jurisdiction 11 Apr 2007 Lim Soon Fang Bryan (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	11 Apr 2007	Lim Soon Fang Bryan (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissed.The defendant's appeal to set aside the order for examination of witnesses in Taiwan was dismissed.
5	PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia v Dexia Bank: Setting Aside Arbitral Award & Public Policy 30 Nov 2006 PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) (Appellant)Lost	30 Nov 2006	PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed.