Bhieman Anandakumar

Bhieman Anandakumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and bills of lading act. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in shipping law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Shipping Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misdelivery	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Ship Leasing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Bhieman Anandakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Bhieman Anandakumar has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	ING Bank NV v Navig8 Ametrine: Misdelivery of Cargo & Summary Judgment(Apr 2022) Hai Jiao v Yaw Chee Siew: Contractual Obligations and Best Endeavours in Ship Leasing(Jul 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Bhieman Anandakumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Bhieman Anandakumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	18,869,114.00	18,869,114.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ING Bank NV v Navig8 Ametrine: Misdelivery of Cargo & Summary Judgment 07 Apr 2022 ING Bank N.V., Singapore Branch (Plaintiff)Partial	07 Apr 2022	ING Bank N.V., Singapore Branch (Plaintiff): Interlocutory judgment granted with damages to be assessedInterlocutory judgment granted with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Hai Jiao v Yaw Chee Siew: Contractual Obligations and Best Endeavours in Ship Leasing 12 Jul 2020 Hai Jiao 1307 Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	12 Jul 2020	Hai Jiao 1307 Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $6,679,114 (assumed USD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).