Blossom Hing

Blossom Hing is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and restraint of trade. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Blossom Hing has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Auditing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidator's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Registration of Charges	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forfeiture Provision	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non-Compete Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debt Restructuring	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stockbroking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Exchange Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Trading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Blossom Hing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Blossom Hing has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	7 cases	88% of cases	PwC v Celestial Nutrifoods: Appeal on Liquidator's Information Powers Under Section 285(Apr 2015) Media Development Authority v Sculptor Finance: Extension of Time for Charge Registration(Nov 2013) Sculptor Finance v Media Development Authority: Extension of Time to Register Charges under Companies Act(Jan 2013)
Drew & Napier	1 cases	13% of cases	Tiang Ming Sing v Datuk Ambrose Joseph Lee: Stock Trading, Moneylending, and Fiduciary Duty(May 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Blossom Hing's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Won	62.5 parties avg	2.5	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Blossom Hing's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(25%)	25%
Won	6(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PwC v Celestial Nutrifoods: Appeal on Liquidator's Information Powers Under Section 285 07 Apr 2015 Celestial Nutrifoods Ltd (Respondent)Won	07 Apr 2015	Celestial Nutrifoods Ltd (Respondent): Application GrantedHigh Court granted the Respondent’s application under s 285 to compel the Appellants to disclose documents in their custody, power or control relating to Celestial’s trade dealings, affairs and property.
2	Media Development Authority v Sculptor Finance: Extension of Time for Charge Registration 06 Nov 2013 Sculptor Finance (MD) Ireland Ltd (Respondent)Won	06 Nov 2013	Sculptor Finance (MD) Ireland Ltd (Respondent): Extension of Time GrantedThe respondent was granted an extension of time to register the charges, subject to certain provisos.
3	Sculptor Finance v Media Development Authority: Extension of Time to Register Charges under Companies Act 23 Jan 2013 Sculptor Finance (MD) Ireland Ltd (Applicant)Won	23 Jan 2013	Sculptor Finance (MD) Ireland Ltd (Applicant): Application grantedApplication for extension of time to register charges was granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Mano Vikrant Singh v Cargill: Restraint of Trade & Forfeiture of Employee Benefits 06 Aug 2012 Cargill TSF Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	06 Aug 2012	Cargill TSF Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
5	Mano Vikrant Singh v Cargill: Enforceability of Forfeiture Provision in Incentive Plan 07 Nov 2011 Cargill TSF Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	07 Nov 2011	Cargill TSF Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim, ruling in favor of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	BNP Paribas v Jurong Shipyard: Injunction Against Winding-Up Petition for Contested Debt 08 Mar 2009 Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	08 Mar 2009	Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd (Respondent): Injunction GrantedInjunction to restrain BNP from commencing winding-up proceedings was granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Deutsche Bank v Asia Pulp & Paper: Judicial Management Order Dispute 30 Oct 2002 Asia Pulp & Paper Company Ltd (Respondent)Won	30 Oct 2002	Asia Pulp & Paper Company Ltd (Respondent): Petition dismissedThe petition for a judicial management order was dismissed.
8	Tiang Ming Sing v Datuk Ambrose Joseph Lee: Stock Trading, Moneylending, and Fiduciary Duty 25 May 2000 Tiang Ming Sing (Plaintiff)Lost	25 May 2000	Tiang Ming Sing (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against all three defendants was dismissed with costs.