Boo Moh Cheh

Boo Moh Cheh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and workers compensation. Their track record shows a 63.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 63% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Strata Management Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Electronic Transactions Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lease Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agreements for leases	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Boo Moh Cheh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Boo Moh Cheh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kurup & Boo	7 cases	88% of cases	Lum Hon Ying v Buildmart Industries: Negligence & Statutory Duty in Crane Accident(Jul 2014) Woon Brothers Investments v Management Corp: Conversion of Originating Summons to Writ for Fraud Allegations(Aug 2011) Lim Keenly Builders v Tokio Marine: Workmen's Compensation Policy Interpretation(Jun 2011)
Kurup and Boo	1 cases	13% of cases	SM Integrated Transware v Schenker Singapore: Lease Agreement Dispute(Mar 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Boo Moh Cheh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.9
Complex Cases: 5 (63%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.7 parties avg	3.7	38%
Won	55.4 parties avg	5.4	63%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2009	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2010	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2011	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Boo Moh Cheh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(38%)	38%
Won	5(63%)	63%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	575,232.05	143,808.014 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lum Hon Ying v Buildmart Industries: Negligence & Statutory Duty in Crane Accident 09 Jul 2014 Buildmart Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	09 Jul 2014	Buildmart Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant; jointly and severally liable for damages to be assessed by the Registrar.
2	Woon Brothers Investments v Management Corp: Conversion of Originating Summons to Writ for Fraud Allegations 24 Aug 2011 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 461 (Respondent)Won	24 Aug 2011	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 461 (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts of $7,500 awarded to the First Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Lim Keenly Builders v Tokio Marine: Workmen's Compensation Policy Interpretation 29 Jun 2011 Lim Keenly Builders Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	29 Jun 2011	Lim Keenly Builders Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed.
4	Woon Brothers v Management Corp: Fraud, Misappropriation & Conflict of Interest 29 Nov 2010 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 461 (Defendant, Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2010	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 461 (Defendant, Respondent): WonThe court allowed the appeal to convert the originating summons to a writ of summons.
5	Rahman v Lim Keenly Builders: Workmen's Compensation & Insurance Coverage for Subcontractor Employees 06 May 2010 Lim Keenly Builders Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	06 May 2010	Lim Keenly Builders Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim by the defendant against the Insurer is dismissed with costs.
6	Joseph Mathew v Singh Chiranjeev: Enforceability of Electronic Contracts for Land Sale 28 Oct 2009 Gulati Jasmine Kaur (Respondent)Won	28 Oct 2009	Gulati Jasmine Kaur (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent; damages awarded in the amount of $15,510.05 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Singh Chiranjeev v Joseph Mathew: Specific Performance of Property Sale Agreement 27 Nov 2008 Gulati Jasmine Kaur (Plaintiff)Won	27 Nov 2008	Gulati Jasmine Kaur (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $15,510.05 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	SM Integrated Transware v Schenker Singapore: Lease Agreement Dispute 29 Mar 2005 Schenker Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Mar 2005	Schenker Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; ordered to pay $505,691.85 in damages, plus costs and interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.