Bryan Ghows

Bryan Ghows is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and copyrights. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Bryan Ghows has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Proof of evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Groundless threat	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Electronic Records	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Standard of Proof for Fraud	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Extension of Limitation Period	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Acknowledgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Patents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patent Validity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Authorship	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Subject matter	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Compilations	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Bryan Ghows has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Bryan Ghows has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Mirandah Law LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	AstraZeneca AB v Ranbaxy: Striking Out Defence and Counterclaim in Patent Infringement Suit(Jan 2012)
Taylor Vinters Via LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Super Group Ltd v Mysore Nagaraja Kartik: Breach of Contract, Electronic Records & Limitation(Sep 2018)
Via Law Corporation	1 cases	33% of cases	Global Yellow Pages v Promedia: Copyright Infringement in Telephone Directories(Apr 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Bryan Ghows's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Bryan Ghows's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	600,000.00	600,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Super Group Ltd v Mysore Nagaraja Kartik: Breach of Contract, Electronic Records & Limitation 13 Sep 2018 Super Group Ltd (formerly known as Super Coffeemix Manufacturing Ltd) (Plaintiff)Won	13 Sep 2018	Super Group Ltd (formerly known as Super Coffeemix Manufacturing Ltd) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffInterlocutory judgment entered against the defendant for US$600,000 (assumed USD, as the debt was denominated in USD).
2	Global Yellow Pages v Promedia: Copyright Infringement in Telephone Directories 18 Apr 2017 Global Yellow Pages Limited (Appellant)Partial	18 Apr 2017	Global Yellow Pages Limited (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed only in relation to the issue of subsistence of copyright and the issue of groundless threats of copyright infringement.
3	AstraZeneca AB v Ranbaxy: Striking Out Defence and Counterclaim in Patent Infringement Suit 12 Jan 2012 Ranbaxy (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Lost	12 Jan 2012	Ranbaxy (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Defence and Counterclaim struck outDisputed pleadings in the Defence and Counterclaim struck out. No monetary amount awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.