Bryce Yeo

Bryce Yeo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and insolvency law. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Bryce Yeo has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and banking law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bryce Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Bryce Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Bryce Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Bryce Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bryce Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Bryce Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Bryce Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Bryce Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Bryce Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Bryce Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Bryce Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Bryce Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreements	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Bryce Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Penalty Doctrine	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Bryce Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Equity of Redemption	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Bryce Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Bryce Yeo has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Ethoz Capital Ltd v Im8ex Pte Ltd: Penalty Doctrine, Misrepresentation, and Mortgage Redemption(Jan 2023)
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Kho Choon Keng v Lian Keng Enterprises: Winding Up, Quasi-Partnership, Legitimate Expectations, Mutual Trust(Jul 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Bryce Yeo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Unknown	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Bryce Yeo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Unknown	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Unknown: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kho Choon Keng v Lian Keng Enterprises: Winding Up, Quasi-Partnership, Legitimate Expectations, Mutual Trust 25 Jul 2024 Kho Chuan Thye Patrick (Non-party)	25 Jul 2024	Kho Chuan Thye Patrick (Non-party): -
2	Ethoz Capital Ltd v Im8ex Pte Ltd: Penalty Doctrine, Misrepresentation, and Mortgage Redemption 19 Jan 2023 Ethoz Capital Ltd (Appellant)Partial	19 Jan 2023	Ethoz Capital Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, but the main part of the Judge’s findings that the payment of the Total Interest upon default and the Default Interest, were unenforceable penalties was upheld. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.