C Arul

C Arul is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in estate administration and shipping. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

C Arul has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shipping	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intestacy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stakeholders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consequential losses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ship Certificate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Leasing Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction and Arrest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ownership of vessels	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	C Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

C Arul has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
C Arul & Partners	4 cases	80% of cases	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Estate Inquiry Costs & Judgment(Jun 2003) Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Inquiry into Deceased's Estate Distribution(Jun 2003) Korea Jonmyong Trading Co v Sea-shore Transportation: Breach of Contract & Remoteness of Damage(Nov 2002)
C Arul and Partners	1 cases	20% of cases	In Re IVANOVO: Charterers' Claim for Breach of Charterparty and State of Ukraine's Ownership Dispute(Feb 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of C Arul's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Unknown	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of C Arul's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Unknown	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	600,200.00	600,200.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Estate Inquiry Costs & Judgment 29 Jun 2003 Sjamsudin Husni also known as Ong Siauw-Tjoan (Second Defendant)Neutral	29 Jun 2003	Sjamsudin Husni also known as Ong Siauw-Tjoan (Second Defendant): Costs of inquiry to be paid by First DefendantThe First Defendant shall pay the Second Defendant the costs of the inquiry from the date C Arul & Partners were appointed as his solicitors, except for costs related to the parentage of the Fourth Defendant and subpoenaing Steven Lim and Tay Swee Sze. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Inquiry into Deceased's Estate Distribution 12 Jun 2003 Ong Siauw Ping (Defendant)	12 Jun 2003	Ong Siauw Ping (Defendant): -
3	Korea Jonmyong Trading Co v Sea-shore Transportation: Breach of Contract & Remoteness of Damage 21 Nov 2002 Korea Jonmyong Trading Co (Plaintiff)Partial	21 Nov 2002	Korea Jonmyong Trading Co (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment was entered in JY’s favour for USD600,200 as damages for breach of contract. The claim for consequential losses was dismissed.
4	In Re IVANOVO: Charterers' Claim for Breach of Charterparty and State of Ukraine's Ownership Dispute 14 Feb 2000 Plaintiffs (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Feb 2000	Plaintiffs (Plaintiff): Writ set asideThe plaintiffs' writ was set aside.
5	Ivanovo: Admiralty Jurisdiction, Vessel Ownership, and the Evidentiary Value of Ship Registration Certificates 14 Feb 2000 Plaintiffs (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Feb 2000	Plaintiffs (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs' claim for breach of charterparty was dismissed as the action was found to be ultra vires.