C P Lee

C P Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and real estate. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

C P Lee has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Proper Notice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conditions of Sale	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Notice to Complete	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	C P Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

C P Lee has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
C P Lee & Co	2 cases	100% of cases	Republic Airconditioning v Shinsung Eng: Summary Judgment for Labour Charges Dispute(Mar 2012) Lim Ah Laik v Surender Singh: Specific Performance of Property Sale Dispute(Sep 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of C P Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of C P Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	323,500.31	323,500.311 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Republic Airconditioning v Shinsung Eng: Summary Judgment for Labour Charges Dispute 05 Mar 2012 Republic Airconditioning (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	05 Mar 2012	Republic Airconditioning (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Judgment for PlaintiffSummary judgment granted to the plaintiff for $323,500.31 together with interest. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lim Ah Laik v Surender Singh: Specific Performance of Property Sale Dispute 05 Sep 2007 Leow Poh Tin (Plaintiff, Purchaser)Lost	05 Sep 2007	Leow Poh Tin (Plaintiff, Purchaser): Claim DismissedPurchaser's claim for specific performance or damages was dismissed.