Calista Peter

Calista Peter is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in enforcement of foreign judgments and recognition of foreign judgments. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Calista Peter has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Default Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loans	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cheque Truncation System	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Calista Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Calista Peter has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gabriel Law Corporation	6 cases	100% of cases	Bing Integrated Construction v Eco Special Waste Management: Construction Payment Dispute(Jun 2010) Tan Keaw Chong v Chua Tiong Guan: Loan Recovery & Oral Contract Dispute(Jan 2010) Westacre Investments Inc v Yugoimport SDPR: Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgment(Dec 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Calista Peter's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	24.3 parties avg	4.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Calista Peter's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	772,621.54	193,155.394 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bing Integrated Construction v Eco Special Waste Management: Construction Payment Dispute 29 Jun 2010 Eco Resource Recovery Centre Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Jun 2010	Eco Resource Recovery Centre Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the 2nd third party, Chua Tiong Guan. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Tan Keaw Chong v Chua Tiong Guan: Loan Recovery & Oral Contract Dispute 14 Jan 2010 Tan Keaw Chong (Plaintiff)Partial	14 Jan 2010	Tan Keaw Chong (Plaintiff): Claim Dismissed, Recovery AllowedPlaintiff's claim based on oral joint-venture agreement was dismissed, but the plaintiff was allowed to recover $196,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Westacre Investments Inc v Yugoimport SDPR: Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgment 29 Dec 2008 The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (Also known as Jugoimport – SDPR) (Respondent)Lost	29 Dec 2008	The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (Also known as Jugoimport – SDPR) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Westacre Investments Inc v Yugoimport-SDPR: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment in Singapore 27 Nov 2006 Yugoimport-SDPR (also known as Jugoimport-SDPR) (Judgment Debtor)Won	27 Nov 2006	Yugoimport-SDPR (also known as Jugoimport-SDPR) (Judgment Debtor): Application to set aside registration grantedThe judgment debtor's application to set aside the registration of the judgment was granted.
5	City Hardware v Goh Boon Chye: Cheque Truncation System & Negotiable Instruments 30 Jan 2005 City Hardware Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jan 2005	City Hardware Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for the plaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $576,621.54 with interest accruing at the rate of 6% per annum from 8 March 2004 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Bakery Mart v Ng Wei Teck: Setting Aside Consent Judgment for Receivership Claim 04 Oct 2004 Bakery Mart Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	04 Oct 2004	Bakery Mart Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedOriginating summons dismissed with costs to Culina fixed at $6,000 and costs to D1 and D2 fixed at $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).