Calvin Liang Hanwen

Calvin Liang Hanwen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in abuse of process and res judicata.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Calvin Liang Hanwen has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and abuse of process.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Calvin Liang Hanwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Calvin Liang Hanwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Calvin Liang Hanwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Calvin Liang Hanwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Calvin Liang Hanwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Calvin Liang Hanwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Calvin Liang Hanwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Calvin Liang Hanwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Calvin Liang Hanwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Calvin Liang Hanwen has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 cases	100% of cases	Lim Geok Lin Andy v Yap Jin Meng Bryan: Abuse of Process, Contract Variation, and Oral Agreement Dispute(Aug 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Calvin Liang Hanwen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Calvin Liang Hanwen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Geok Lin Andy v Yap Jin Meng Bryan: Abuse of Process, Contract Variation, and Oral Agreement Dispute 13 Aug 2017 Yap Jin Meng Bryan (Respondent)Partial	13 Aug 2017	Yap Jin Meng Bryan (Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part. The Appellant is to pay the Respondent the costs of the suit on a standard basis throughout. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.