Candace Ler

Candace Ler is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in schemes of arrangement and damages. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Candace Ler has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fund Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statements of Intention	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extension of Timelines	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Creditors' Meeting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loss of Amenity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Salesmen’s puff	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Candace Ler has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Candace Ler has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen and Gledhill	4 cases	57% of cases	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd: Extension of Timeline for Scheme of Arrangement(Oct 2005) Raffles Town Club: Appointment of Receiver and Manager in Scheme of Arrangement(Sep 2005) Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd: Scheme of Arrangement Dispute with Litigant-Members(Sep 2005)
Allen & Gledhill	3 cases	43% of cases	Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in Club Membership(Aug 2003) Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in Club Membership(Nov 2002) Abdul Razak Valibhoy v Keppel Investment Management Ltd: Breach of Contract and Fiduciary Duty in Investment Management(Oct 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Candace Ler's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.3 parties avg	4.3	57%
Won	35.0 parties avg	5.0	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	26.5 parties avg	6.5
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	44.3 parties avg	4.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Candace Ler's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(57%)	57%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	3,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd: Extension of Timeline for Scheme of Arrangement 19 Oct 2005 Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	19 Oct 2005	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedThe company's application to extend the timelines for the consideration of the scheme proposal and the convening of the meeting to discuss the scheme was dismissed.
2	Raffles Town Club: Appointment of Receiver and Manager in Scheme of Arrangement 21 Sep 2005 Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	21 Sep 2005	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Respondent): Applications dismissedApplications for the appointment of a special receiver and manager, to restrain the Club from dealing with its assets, and for liberty to examine the officers and directors of the Club were dismissed.
3	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd: Scheme of Arrangement Dispute with Litigant-Members 14 Sep 2005 Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	14 Sep 2005	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedThe Club's application faced a setback as the litigant-members' application to set aside the orders was dismissed on a preliminary point.
4	Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club: Damages for Breach of Contract & Loss of Club Amenity 22 Feb 2005 Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	22 Feb 2005	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against defendantJudgment against the defendant; damages awarded to the plaintiffs in the total amount of $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in Club Membership 10 Aug 2003 Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	10 Aug 2003	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; found in breach of contract.
6	Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in Club Membership 21 Nov 2002 Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	21 Nov 2002	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantClaims for misrepresentation and breach of contract dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Abdul Razak Valibhoy v Keppel Investment Management Ltd: Breach of Contract and Fiduciary Duty in Investment Management 10 Oct 2002 Keppel Investment Management Ltd (Defendant)Won	10 Oct 2002	Keppel Investment Management Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff's action is dismissed with costs.