Candy Agnes Sutedja

Candy Agnes Sutedja is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in strata title law and legal ethics and professional responsibility. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	4 cases	15% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Building Management	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Alternative Dispute Resolution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Candy Agnes Sutedja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Candy Agnes Sutedja has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Asplenium Land v Lam Chye Shing: Legal Professional Privilege for In-House Counsel(Feb 2019) Sit Kwong Lam v Management Corporation: Strata Title, Common Property Dispute(Mar 2018) Sit Kwong Lam v MCST Plan No 2645: Strata Titles, Common Property, By-Laws Dispute(Mar 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Candy Agnes Sutedja's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%
Won	33.3 parties avg	3.3	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Candy Agnes Sutedja's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	40,000.00	10,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Asplenium Land v Lam Chye Shing: Legal Professional Privilege for In-House Counsel 21 Feb 2019 Asplenium Land Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	21 Feb 2019	Asplenium Land Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedApplication allowed; declaratory and injunctive reliefs granted in respect of the Item 3 and Item 4 documents. Costs of the application and reasonable disbursements to be paid by CKR to Asplenium, the quantum of which was to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Sit Kwong Lam v Management Corporation: Strata Title, Common Property Dispute 04 Mar 2018 SIT KWONG LAM (Appellant)Lost	04 Mar 2018	SIT KWONG LAM (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and costs of the appeal awarded to the Respondent fixed at $40,000, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Sit Kwong Lam v MCST Plan No 2645: Strata Titles, Common Property, By-Laws Dispute 26 Mar 2017 SIT KWONG LAM (Appellant)Lost	26 Mar 2017	SIT KWONG LAM (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Asplenium Land v CKR Contract Services: SOPA, Prohibited Repeat Claims & Post-Termination Claims 11 May 2016 Asplenium Land Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	11 May 2016	Asplenium Land Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court declared Payment Claim No. 22 invalid and ordered the Defendant to withdraw Adjudication Application No. SOP/AA 423 of 2015 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	CKR Contract Services v Asplenium Land: Enforceability of Clause Restricting Performance Bond Calls Based on Unconscionability 21 Apr 2015 Asplenium Land Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant)Won	21 Apr 2015	Asplenium Land Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAsplenium's appeal against the Judge’s decision was allowed.