Carene Poh

Carene Poh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Carene Poh has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	8 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	6 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	6 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Aggravated Rape	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault by penetration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Disability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Knowledge	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Youthful Offenders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Carene Poh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Carene Poh has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	8 cases	100% of cases	Mohamed Affandi v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Chain of Evidence(Dec 2018) Public Prosecutor v Ramdhan bin Lajis: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2018) Public Prosecutor v ASR: Sentencing of Young Offender with Intellectual Disability for Rape & Sexual Assault(Apr 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Carene Poh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Won	62.7 parties avg	2.7	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	52.6 parties avg	2.6

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Carene Poh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(13%)	13%
Other	1(13%)	13%
Won	6(75%)	75%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	5 113	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Other: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 3 cases (60.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mohamed Affandi v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Chain of Evidence 04 Dec 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	04 Dec 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, setting aside the conviction.
2	Public Prosecutor v Ramdhan bin Lajis: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Apr 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Apr 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty verdict
3	Public Prosecutor v ASR: Sentencing of Young Offender with Intellectual Disability for Rape & Sexual Assault 19 Apr 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Other	19 Apr 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Appeal pendingThe Prosecution has appealed against the decision to sentence the Accused to Reformative Training.
4	Public Prosecutor v Mangalagiri Dhruva Kumar: Drug Trafficking, Retraction of Guilty Plea 20 Mar 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 Mar 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Successful ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor successfully prosecuted Mangalagiri Dhruva Kumar for drug trafficking.
5	Zainudin bin Mohamed v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Courier Exception, and Misuse of Drugs Act 11 Feb 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	11 Feb 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe High Court’s decision to pass the sentence of death on the Appellant was upheld.
6	Masoud Rahimi v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Trafficking 29 Dec 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Dec 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment upheldThe Court of Appeal upheld the convictions and sentences imposed by the trial judge.
7	Public Prosecutor v Christeen Jayamany & Datchinamurthy Kataiah: Trafficking Diamorphine, Knowledge of Drugs, Courier Exception 07 May 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	07 May 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction of both accusedThe Public Prosecutor secured the conviction of both accused persons on charges of drug trafficking.
8	Choo Kok Hwee v PP: Enhanced Sentencing for Second DUI Offence under Road Traffic Act 29 Jun 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Jun 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence imposed on the appellant.