Carol Teh

Carol Teh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and winding up. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Carol Teh has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Equitable Execution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Carol Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Carol Teh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	Tan Holdings v Prosperity Steel: Receivership, Bonus Shares & Locus Standi(Sep 2011) Petroprod Ltd v Larsen Oil and Gas: Stay of Action for Arbitration and Insolvency Law(Jun 2010)
Shook Lin and Bok LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Larsen Oil and Gas v Petroprod: Arbitration vs. Insolvency – Enforceability of Arbitration Clause in Liquidation(May 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Carol Teh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Carol Teh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Holdings v Prosperity Steel: Receivership, Bonus Shares & Locus Standi 29 Sep 2011 Tan Holdings Pte Ltd (in creditor's voluntary liquidation) (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Sep 2011	Tan Holdings Pte Ltd (in creditor's voluntary liquidation) (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Larsen Oil and Gas v Petroprod: Arbitration vs. Insolvency – Enforceability of Arbitration Clause in Liquidation 10 May 2011 Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) (Respondent)Won	10 May 2011	Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
3	Petroprod Ltd v Larsen Oil and Gas: Stay of Action for Arbitration and Insolvency Law 29 Jun 2010 Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) (Plaintiff)Won	29 Jun 2010	Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) (Plaintiff): Application for stay dismissedLarsen's application for a stay of the main action in favour of arbitration was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.