Carolyn Tan

Carolyn Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in succession law and estate administration. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Carolyn Tan has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recusal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Prospective Relief	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mortgagee in Possession	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Carolyn Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Carolyn Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan & Au LLP	5 cases	83% of cases	Ong Wui Teck v Ong Wui Swoon: Recusal Application in Estate Dispute(Mar 2016) Ong Wui Swoon v Ong Wui Teck: Appeal on Estate Account & Costs(Aug 2014) Long Say Ting Daniel v Merukh Nunik Elizabeth: Director's Relief under Companies Act(Dec 2012)
Tan & Au Partnership	1 cases	17% of cases	Tai Sea Nyong v Overseas Union Bank: Mortgagee's Duty of Sale & Property Valuation(Feb 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Carolyn Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	50%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Carolyn Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Partial	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ong Wui Teck v Ong Wui Swoon: Recusal Application in Estate Dispute 20 Mar 2016 Ong Wui Swoon (Defendant)Neutral	20 Mar 2016	Ong Wui Swoon (Defendant): Application opposedMdm Ong opposed the application.
2	Ong Wui Swoon v Ong Wui Teck: Appeal on Estate Account & Costs 06 Aug 2014 Ong Wui Swoon (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	06 Aug 2014	Ong Wui Swoon (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe Sister's appeal (RA 72/2014) was partially allowed. The court set aside AR Khng’s decision to allow the Brother an extension of time to appeal against AR Leong’s substantive decision, but allowed the extension of time to appeal against AR Leong’s costs order to remain. No costs were awarded.
3	Long Say Ting Daniel v Merukh Nunik Elizabeth: Director's Relief under Companies Act 17 Dec 2012 Long Say Ting Daniel (Plaintiff)Partial	17 Dec 2012	Long Say Ting Daniel (Plaintiff): Application granted in partApplication granted in respect of the plaintiff’s potential liability to the Company.
4	Management Corporation v Tham Keng Mun: District Court Jurisdiction & Breach of Statutory Duty 01 Nov 2010 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2911 (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	01 Nov 2010	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2911 (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; the Management Corporation lost the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Blenwel Agencies v Tan Lee King: Appeal Leave Refusal for Wheel Clamp Damage Claim 17 Oct 2007 Blenwel Agencies Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	17 Oct 2007	Blenwel Agencies Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant): Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal refusedThe plaintiff's application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed.
6	Tai Sea Nyong v Overseas Union Bank: Mortgagee's Duty of Sale & Property Valuation 27 Feb 2002 Tai Sea Nyong (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Feb 2002	Tai Sea Nyong (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs to the defendant.