Cassandra Ow

Cassandra Ow is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and international arbitration. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cassandra Ow has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cassandra Ow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cassandra Ow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cassandra Ow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cassandra Ow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cassandra Ow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
International Trade	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cassandra Ow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cassandra Ow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cassandra Ow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cassandra Ow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cassandra Ow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Submission to Jurisdiction	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cassandra Ow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Cassandra Ow has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
ATMD Bird & Bird LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	R1 International v Lonstroff: Anti-Suit Injunction & International Arbitration(Apr 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cassandra Ow's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cassandra Ow's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	R1 International v Lonstroff: Anti-Suit Injunction & International Arbitration 13 Apr 2014 Lonstroff AG (Defendant)Won	13 Apr 2014	Lonstroff AG (Defendant): Appeal AllowedLonstroff's appeal was allowed and the interim anti-suit injunction was discharged.