Celine Liow Wan-Ting

Celine Liow Wan-Ting is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and winding up. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Takeovers	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Convertible notes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Units of shares	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Celine Liow Wan-Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Celine Liow Wan-Ting has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Portcom Pte Ltd v Verrency Group Ltd: Compulsory Share Acquisition under Companies Act s 215(Apr 2022)
Forte Law LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Chia Vui Khen Jason v HR Easily Pte Ltd: Winding-Up Application for Unpaid Salary(May 2024)
Straits Law Practice LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Lee Boon Teow v. Shi Guojun: Contractual Terms, Implied Terms, and Constructive Trusts Dispute(May 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Celine Liow Wan-Ting's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Celine Liow Wan-Ting's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chia Vui Khen Jason v HR Easily Pte Ltd: Winding-Up Application for Unpaid Salary 02 May 2024 HR Easily Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	02 May 2024	HR Easily Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedWinding-up application dismissed.
2	Portcom Pte Ltd v Verrency Group Ltd: Compulsory Share Acquisition under Companies Act s 215 28 Apr 2022 Verrency Holdings Limited (Respondent)Lost	28 Apr 2022	Verrency Holdings Limited (Respondent): Application DismissedThe respondents' attempt to compulsorily acquire shares was dismissed.
3	Lee Boon Teow v. Shi Guojun: Contractual Terms, Implied Terms, and Constructive Trusts Dispute 01 May 2018 Shi Guojun @ Lai Meau Shin (Lai MiaoXin) (Defendant)Won	01 May 2018	Shi Guojun @ Lai Meau Shin (Lai MiaoXin) (Defendant): Action dismissedThe Plaintiff's action was dismissed, and the Plaintiff was ordered to pay the disbursements of the action to the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.