Cha Meiyin

Cha Meiyin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and undue influence.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cha Meiyin has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and corporate law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cha Meiyin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cha Meiyin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cha Meiyin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cha Meiyin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cha Meiyin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cha Meiyin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cha Meiyin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cha Meiyin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cha Meiyin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cha Meiyin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cha Meiyin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Director's Disqualification	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cha Meiyin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cha Meiyin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Cha Meiyin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 cases	50% of cases	Kardachi v Attorney-General: Director Disqualification under Section 155A Companies Act(Sep 2020)
Tan Kok Quan Partnership LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	BLL v BLM: Issue Estoppel & Res Judicata in Mental Capacity Case(Sep 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cha Meiyin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cha Meiyin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	20,000.00	20,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kardachi v Attorney-General: Director Disqualification under Section 155A Companies Act 21 Sep 2020 Jason Aleksander Kardachi (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	21 Sep 2020	Jason Aleksander Kardachi (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $20,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	BLL v BLM: Issue Estoppel & Res Judicata in Mental Capacity Case 09 Sep 2019 BLL (Plaintiff)Neutral	09 Sep 2019	BLL (Plaintiff): Allowed relitigation of undue influence issueThe court allowed the defendants to relitigate the issue of undue influence.