Chai Yi Ling Gillian

Chai Yi Ling Gillian is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and strata titles. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chai Yi Ling Gillian has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chai Yi Ling Gillian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chai Yi Ling Gillian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chai Yi Ling Gillian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chai Yi Ling Gillian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chai Yi Ling Gillian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chai Yi Ling Gillian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chai Yi Ling Gillian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Building Maintenance	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chai Yi Ling Gillian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chai Yi Ling Gillian has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	1 cases	100% of cases	MCST Plan No 2553 v Chia Yew Liang: Interpretation of Mixed-Use Development under BMSMA(Nov 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chai Yi Ling Gillian's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	17.0 parties avg	7.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chai Yi Ling Gillian's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	800.00	800.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	MCST Plan No 2553 v Chia Yew Liang: Interpretation of Mixed-Use Development under BMSMA 27 Nov 2022 The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2553 (Appellant)Won	27 Nov 2022	The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2553 (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; MCST awarded disbursements of $800 for proceedings before the STB (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).