Chan Daniel

Chan Daniel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and bankruptcy. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chan Daniel has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and jurisdiction.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeals	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Waiver of Privilege	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Common Interest Privilege	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Judgments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chan Daniel has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Luckin Coffee Inc v Interactive Digital Finance Ltd: Jurisdiction & Service Out of Singapore(Mar 2024) Loh Cheng Lee Aaron v Hodlnaut Pte Ltd: Winding Up for Cryptocurrency Liabilities under IRDA(Nov 2023) Mukherjee v Biswas: Bankruptcy Proceedings & Duty to Obtain Sanction of Official Assignee(Sep 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chan Daniel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.8
Complex Cases: 4 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	112.0 parties avg	12.0	25%
Neutral	27.5 parties avg	7.5	50%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	112.0 parties avg	12.0
2023	27.5 parties avg	7.5
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chan Daniel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Neutral	2(50%)	50%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Neutral: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Luckin Coffee Inc v Interactive Digital Finance Ltd: Jurisdiction & Service Out of Singapore 04 Mar 2024 Credit Suisse AG (Respondent)Won	04 Mar 2024	Credit Suisse AG (Respondent): Application for permission to appeal dismissedLuckin's application for permission to appeal against the decision of the Judge in RA 206 was dismissed. The court ordered Luckin to pay the costs of the application fixed at $7,000, inclusive of disbursements, to the Claimants collectively, and also to Credit Suisse AG individually. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Loh Cheng Lee Aaron v Hodlnaut Pte Ltd: Winding Up for Cryptocurrency Liabilities under IRDA 09 Nov 2023 Algorand Foundation Ltd (Non-party)Neutral	09 Nov 2023	Algorand Foundation Ltd (Non-party): NeutralAlgorand Foundation Ltd was a non-party in this case (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Mukherjee v Biswas: Bankruptcy Proceedings & Duty to Obtain Sanction of Official Assignee 14 Sep 2023 Barclays Bank PLC (Respondent)Neutral	14 Sep 2023	Barclays Bank PLC (Respondent): NeutralThe outcome for Barclays Bank PLC is neutral as the application for pre-action discovery was not considered. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Motorola Solutions v Uzan: Common Interest Privilege and Waiver in Enforcing Foreign Judgments 02 Sep 2015 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS CREDIT COMPANY LLC (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Sep 2015	MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS CREDIT COMPANY LLC (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe plaintiff's application was dismissed.