Chan Huimin

Chan Huimin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and penal code. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chan Huimin has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Huimin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chan Huimin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Huimin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Chan Huimin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chan Huimin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Huimin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Provocation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Huimin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Huimin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Family Violence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Huimin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chan Huimin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Clang of the prison gates principle	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Huimin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chan Huimin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chan Huimin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chan Huimin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	100% of cases	PP v Pathip Selvan: Murder, Provocation, and Diminished Responsibility(Nov 2010) PP v Firdaus bin Abdullah: Child Abuse, Grievous Hurt, and Sentencing(Mar 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chan Huimin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chan Huimin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Pathip Selvan: Murder, Provocation, and Diminished Responsibility 11 Nov 2010 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	11 Nov 2010	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty of murder as charged.
2	PP v Firdaus bin Abdullah: Child Abuse, Grievous Hurt, and Sentencing 16 Mar 2010 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Partial	16 Mar 2010	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe appeal was allowed in part, with the sentences adjusted.