Chan Jian Da

Chan Jian Da is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in jurisdiction and conflict of laws. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chan Jian Da has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sham Transaction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Novation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreements	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chan Jian Da has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chan Jian Da has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	Sinopec v Bank of Communications: Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens in Letter of Credit Dispute(Oct 2021) Goodwood Associates v. Southernpec: Sham Contracts, Conspiracy & Fuel Oil Trading(Nov 2020) BXH v BXI: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Lack of Jurisdiction & Assignment of Arbitration Agreement(Apr 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chan Jian Da's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	67%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chan Jian Da's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	50,000.00	50,000.001 cases	1
USD	1,491,669.26	1,491,669.261 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sinopec v Bank of Communications: Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens in Letter of Credit Dispute 27 Oct 2021 Bank of Communications Co Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Oct 2021	Bank of Communications Co Ltd (Defendant): Applications DismissedDefendant's applications challenging jurisdiction and seeking a stay of proceedings were dismissed.
2	Goodwood Associates v. Southernpec: Sham Contracts, Conspiracy & Fuel Oil Trading 04 Nov 2020 Southernpec (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	04 Nov 2020	Southernpec (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment against the Defendant in the amount of $1,491,669.26 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts and the parties are engaged in international trade).
3	BXH v BXI: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Lack of Jurisdiction & Assignment of Arbitration Agreement 01 Apr 2020 BXH (Appellant)Partial	01 Apr 2020	BXH (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part in relation to Debt B. Respondent to pay the appellant costs fixed at $50,000 inclusive of disbursements. The costs order below is also reversed in favor of the appellant. The usual consequential orders shall apply. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.