Chan Kit Munn Claudia

Chan Kit Munn Claudia is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and international commercial arbitration. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in jurisdiction and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Jurisdiction	6 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	6 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proportionality	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reasonableness	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance and champerty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Champerty and maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cost-proofing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Kit Munn Claudia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chan Kit Munn Claudia has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Prolegis LLC	6 cases	75% of cases	Udenna Corp v Pertamina: Setting Aside Service of Process in International Arbitration Enforcement(Nov 2024) Pertamina v Phoenix Petroleum: Setting Aside Service of Process in SICC Arbitration Enforcement(Sep 2024) Pertamina v Phoenix Petroleum: Costs Dispute in Anti-Suit Injunction & Enforcement of Arbitration Award(Sep 2024)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	2 cases	25% of cases	POA Recovery v Yau Kwok Seng: Illegality, Public Policy, Maintenance, Champerty, Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Deceit(Feb 2022) POA Recovery Pte Ltd v Yau Kwok Seng: Investment Fraud, Maintenance, and Champerty(Feb 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chan Kit Munn Claudia's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	13%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	13%
Won	62.7 parties avg	2.7	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2024	62.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chan Kit Munn Claudia's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(13%)	13%
Neutral	1(13%)	13%
Won	6(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	524,880.41	87,480.076 cases	6
USD	5,000.00	5,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	6 6	Won: 6 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Udenna Corp v Pertamina: Setting Aside Service of Process in International Arbitration Enforcement 26 Nov 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Respondent, Applicant, Claimant)Won	26 Nov 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Respondent, Applicant, Claimant): Costs awardedPIMD was awarded costs of USD 5,000, payable by Udenna. The currency is assumed to be USD as it was requested by PIMD.
2	Pertamina v Phoenix Petroleum: Setting Aside Service of Process in SICC Arbitration Enforcement 26 Sep 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	26 Sep 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Application grantedApplication to set aside service of originating application dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD for Singapore.
3	Pertamina v Phoenix Petroleum: Costs Dispute in Anti-Suit Injunction & Enforcement of Arbitration Award 05 Sep 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	05 Sep 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Costs awardedCosts awarded in the sum of $319,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Pertamina v. Phoenix: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Scope. Dispute over unpaid petroleum product shipments. 27 Jun 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant, Applicant)Won	27 Jun 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant, Applicant): Application GrantedRelief sought in Originating Application No 1 of 2024 granted. Costs of OA 1 and OA 23 including SUM 21 to be paid by Phoenix, such costs to be assessed by the court unless otherwise agreed by the parties. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Pertamina v P-H-O-E-N-I-X: Costs for Contempt of Court in Arbitration Enforcement 27 Jun 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	27 Jun 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Costs awardedCosts of SUM 8 awarded in the sum of $205,880.41 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Pertamina v P-H-O-E-N-I-X: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Dispute 25 Apr 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	25 Apr 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Applications in Summons 8 dismissed; orders in ORC 5 to standApplications in Summons 8 dismissed; orders in ORC 5 to stand. No monetary amount awarded.
7	POA Recovery v Yau Kwok Seng: Illegality, Public Policy, Maintenance, Champerty, Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Deceit 17 Feb 2022 POA Recovery Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Neutral	17 Feb 2022	POA Recovery Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Judgment under the sub-heading of “Champerty and maintenance” remainsThe court's decision regarding champerty and maintenance remains unchanged despite the clarification on the security for costs.
8	POA Recovery Pte Ltd v Yau Kwok Seng: Investment Fraud, Maintenance, and Champerty 02 Feb 2022 POA Recovery Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	02 Feb 2022	POA Recovery Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedPOA Recovery is to bear the costs of AD 26, fixed at S$85,000 (all-in). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.