Chan Ming Onn David

Chan Ming Onn David is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 14 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 71% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated expertise across 59 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	7 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administration of Insolvent Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proof of Debt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Set-off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recipient liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service of document	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Party Autonomy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joinder of Parties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Double Separability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidators	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Provisional liquidators	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chan Ming Onn David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chan Ming Onn David has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	13 cases	93% of cases	Kyen Resources v Feima International: Liquidators' Crossclaims & Proof of Debt(Mar 2024) Envy Asset Management v Lau Lee Sheng: Striking Out Pleadings & Amendment Application(Feb 2024) Yap Cheng Ghee Bob v Envy Asset Management: Liquidators' Directions Under IRDA s 145(3)(Nov 2023)
Shook Lin & Bok	1 cases	7% of cases	Tan Choon Wee v Pine Capital Group: Injunctions, Directors' Removal & Companies Act(Aug 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chan Ming Onn David's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 10 (71%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	77.7 parties avg	7.7	50%
Partial	38.7 parties avg	8.7	21%
Won	44.4 parties avg	4.4	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2022	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2023	37.6 parties avg	7.6
2024	210.7 parties avg	10.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chan Ming Onn David's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(50%)	50%
Partial	3(21%)	21%
Won	4(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
RMB	30,025,000.00	30,025,000.001 cases	1
SGD	68,000.00	11,333.336 cases	6
USD	66,838,374.08	66,838,374.081 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2024	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 14 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kyen Resources v Feima International: Liquidators' Crossclaims & Proof of Debt 04 Mar 2024 Goh Thien Phong (Appellant)Lost	04 Mar 2024	Goh Thien Phong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Goh Thien Phong, as liquidator, was not successful in challenging the decision to allow Feima International's proof of debt.
2	Envy Asset Management v Lau Lee Sheng: Striking Out Pleadings & Amendment Application 07 Feb 2024 Toh Ai Ling (Claimant, Defendant in Counterclaim)Lost	07 Feb 2024	Toh Ai Ling (Claimant, Defendant in Counterclaim): Appeal dismissedThe appeal by the first and second defendants against the claimants was dismissed.
3	Yap Cheng Ghee Bob v Envy Asset Management: Liquidators' Directions Under IRDA s 145(3) 30 Nov 2023 Wong Pheng Cheong Martin (Plaintiff)Won	30 Nov 2023	Wong Pheng Cheong Martin (Plaintiff): Directions sought were grantedThe liquidators were granted the directions they sought from the court.
4	How Weng Fan v Sengkang Town Council: Costs Allocation in AHTC Negligence Case 28 Nov 2023 Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (Respondent)Lost	28 Nov 2023	Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (Respondent): Costs order made againstCosts order made against Aljunied-Hougang Town Council. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	How Weng Fan v Sengkang Town Council: Negligence, Control Failures, and Town Council Liability 06 Jul 2023 Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (Respondent)Partial	06 Jul 2023	Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partMr Low, Ms Lim, Ms How, and Mr Loh are liable to AHTC in negligence for permitting the control failures in the System. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Feima International v Kyen Resources: Proof of Debt in Liquidation Dispute 04 Dec 2022 Goh Thien Phong (Defendant)Lost	04 Dec 2022	Goh Thien Phong (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedKyen's counterclaim for dishonest assistance and knowing receipt was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	How Weng Fan v Sengkang Town Council: Town Councils Act, Fiduciary Duty, Negligence, Public Officers 08 Nov 2022 Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	08 Nov 2022	Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; the Court found that the Town Councillors and Employees did not owe fiduciary duties to AHTC.
8	CJD v CJE and CJF: Dispute over Joinder of Third Parties in Arbitration under LCIA Rules 18 Mar 2021 CJF (Defendant)Won	18 Mar 2021	CJF (Defendant): Successful defenseSuccessful defense against the originating summons. The plaintiff was ordered to pay costs to the defendants fixed at $11,500 together with reasonable disbursements (to be agreed and failing agreement, taxed) for OS 1446 and SUM 1075. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Superpark Oy v Super Park Asia: Provisional Liquidators & Voluntary Winding Up Dispute 10 Feb 2021 Superpark Oy (Appellant, Applicant)Won	10 Feb 2021	Superpark Oy (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs of $40,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Tembusu Growth Fund II Ltd v Yee Fook Khong: Contract Breach, Remoteness of Damages, Promissory Estoppel 19 May 2020 Tan Chin Loke Eugene (Defendant)Lost	19 May 2020	Tan Chin Loke Eugene (Defendant): Order to deliver up share certificatesThe court ordered that the share certificates representing 13.8% of the shareholding of Metro are to be handed over by the defendants to the plaintiffs as continuing security for the Outstanding Amount.
11	Tan Choon Wee v Pine Capital Group: Injunctions, Directors' Removal & Companies Act 29 Aug 2019 Pine Capital Group Limited (Defendant, Plaintiff)Partial	29 Aug 2019	Pine Capital Group Limited (Defendant, Plaintiff): Orders sought pursuant to ss 182 and 392 of the Companies Act granted in partThe court only granted the orders sought in (b) above (“the second 24 April Order”). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd v Sze Siu Hung: Service Out of Jurisdiction and Setting Aside Default Judgment 26 Apr 2018 Sze Siu Hung (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	26 Apr 2018	Sze Siu Hung (Defendant, Appellant): Appeals DismissedDefendant's appeals and application to adduce further evidence dismissed.
13	Humpuss Sea Transport v PT Humpuss: Service of Process Out of Jurisdiction 28 May 2015 Humpuss Sea Transport Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	28 May 2015	Humpuss Sea Transport Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Plaintiff): Application grantedDefendants’ application dismissed with costs fixed at $5,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Bank of China v Huang Ziqiang: Guarantee Enforcement & Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Loan Facility Revision 19 Nov 2014 Huang Ziqiang (Defendant)Lost	19 Nov 2014	Huang Ziqiang (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; judgment entered against the defendant for US$66,838,374.08 together with further contractual interest. Assumed USD, as the loan was in USD.