Chan Wei Meng

Chan Wei Meng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sale of land and civil procedure. Their track record shows a 71.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Warranties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Renovation Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting Standards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Auditing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lock-up Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidator's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Detention of Cargo	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chan Wei Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chan Wei Meng has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	5 cases	71% of cases	Re Brightoil Petroleum: Scheme of Arrangement under IRDA s 71 & Classification of Scheme Creditors with Lock-Up Agreements(Feb 2022) BNY v Celestial Nutrifoods: s285 Companies Act Examination of PwC(Aug 2014) Giorgio Ferrari Pte Ltd v Lifebrandz Ltd: Breach of Contract & Discovery Order Dispute(Oct 2012)
Drew and Napier LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	Teo Teo Lee v Top Chance Properties: Specific Performance & Breach of Contract in Property Sale(Dec 2004)
Drew & Napier	1 cases	14% of cases	Tan Hock Keng v L and M Group Investments Ltd: Contractual Obligation & Guarantee Dispute(Apr 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chan Wei Meng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	53.5 parties avg	3.5	71%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	11.0 parties avg	1.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chan Wei Meng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	5(71%)	71%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	143,500.00	47,833.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Brightoil Petroleum: Scheme of Arrangement under IRDA s 71 & Classification of Scheme Creditors with Lock-Up Agreements 17 Feb 2022 Brightoil Petroleum (S’pore) Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	17 Feb 2022	Brightoil Petroleum (S’pore) Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application grantedThe court approved the scheme of arrangement.
2	BNY v Celestial Nutrifoods: s285 Companies Act Examination of PwC 05 Aug 2014 Yit Chee Wah (Applicant)Won	05 Aug 2014	Yit Chee Wah (Applicant): Application AllowedThe liquidator's application to examine PwC was allowed.
3	Giorgio Ferrari Pte Ltd v Lifebrandz Ltd: Breach of Contract & Discovery Order Dispute 09 Oct 2012 Lifebrandz Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	09 Oct 2012	Lifebrandz Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Teo Teo Lee v Top Chance Properties: Specific Performance & Breach of Contract in Property Sale 21 Dec 2004 Top Chance Properties Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	21 Dec 2004	Top Chance Properties Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application to withdraw summons granted; costs awarded to defendantThe court granted the plaintiff leave to withdraw the summons and awarded costs of $2,500 to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Tan Hock Keng v L and M Group Investments Ltd: Contractual Obligation & Guarantee Dispute 11 Apr 2002 Tan Hock Keng (Appellant)Partial	11 Apr 2002	Tan Hock Keng (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partTan's claim in the action is remitted for continued hearing.
6	Great Eastern Hotel v Ng Yew Seng: Breach of Contract & Renovation Dispute 18 Nov 2001 Ang Kho Thang (Other)Won	18 Nov 2001	Ang Kho Thang (Other): Claims DismissedAll claims by any of the Defendants against Mr Ang personally are also dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	AFS Freight Management v Freight Links Express: Cargo Detention & Debt Liability 18 Sep 2001 AFS Freight Management (2000) Pty Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	18 Sep 2001	AFS Freight Management (2000) Pty Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Plaintiff is also entitled to a refund of storage charges paid under protest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).