Chandra Mohan

Chandra Mohan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 19 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and legal malpractice. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 21% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chandra Mohan has demonstrated expertise across 83 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	11 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	8 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Force Majeure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unreasonable Behaviour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Residential Property Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Economic Duress	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Video Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forensic Accounting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction Objections	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tort of Conspiracy to Defraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Subpoena	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign arbitral award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Production of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chandra Mohan has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	8 cases	42% of cases	Anil Singh Gurm v J S Yeh & Co: Video Link Evidence & Witness's Fear of Prosecution(Oct 2018) Wong Kok Yee v Ng Ming San: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance(Jan 2008) Alliance Management SA v Pendleton Lane P: Discovery, Production of Documents & Inspection(Aug 2007)
Rajah & Tann LLP	6 cases	32% of cases	Ong Jane Rebecca v PricewaterhouseCoopers: Professional Negligence Claim Dismissed(May 2012) Ong Jane Rebecca v PricewaterhouseCoopers: Professional Negligence Claim(Sep 2011) PT Makindo v Aperchance: Contempt of Court for Misleading Advertisements(Aug 2010)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	2 cases	11% of cases	Lim Siew Soo v Sembawang Engineers: Priority of Costs in Company Winding Up(Feb 2021) Cheo Yeoh & Associates LLC v AEL: Professional Negligence in Will Execution(May 2015)
Tan Rajah & Cheah	1 cases	5% of cases	Castello Ana Paula Costa Fusillier v Lobo Carlos Manuel Rosado: Divorce Based on Unreasonable Behaviour(Sep 2003)
M & A Law Corporation	1 cases	5% of cases	Alliance Management SA v Pendleton Lane P: Striking Out Defence for Non-Compliance with Discovery Orders(Jun 2008)
Rajah and Tann	1 cases	5% of cases	Yap Jeffery Henry v Seow Timothy: Conspiracy to Defraud & Breach of Companies Act(Jan 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chandra Mohan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 4 (21%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	84.1 parties avg	4.1	42%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	5%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	5%
Won	102.7 parties avg	2.7	53%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2006	34.9 parties avg	4.9
2007	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	32.5 parties avg	2.5
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chandra Mohan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(40%)	40%
Neutral	1(5%)	5%
Partial	1(5%)	5%
Won	10(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	350,153.40	29,179.4512 cases	12

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 19 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Siew Soo v Sembawang Engineers: Priority of Costs in Company Winding Up 09 Feb 2021 Metax Eco Solutions Pte Ltd (Intervener)Won	09 Feb 2021	Metax Eco Solutions Pte Ltd (Intervener): WonThe court ruled in favor of the intervener and ordered the Company to pay the intervener its costs of and incidental to this application, such costs fixed at $13,000 including disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Anil Singh Gurm v J S Yeh & Co: Video Link Evidence & Witness's Fear of Prosecution 04 Oct 2018 Yasmin Binte Abdullah (Defendant)Won	04 Oct 2018	Yasmin Binte Abdullah (Defendant): WonCosts of $6,000 awarded to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Cheo Yeoh & Associates LLC v AEL: Professional Negligence in Will Execution 25 May 2015 Cheo Yeoh & Associates LLC (Appellant)Lost	25 May 2015	Cheo Yeoh & Associates LLC (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Ong Jane Rebecca v PricewaterhouseCoopers: Professional Negligence Claim Dismissed 15 May 2012 Arul Chew & Partners (Defendant)Won	15 May 2012	Arul Chew & Partners (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant on CounterclaimJudgment awarded to Arul Chew & Partners on their counterclaim for professional fees. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Ong Jane Rebecca v PricewaterhouseCoopers: Professional Negligence Claim 13 Sep 2011 Others (Defendant)Partial	13 Sep 2011	Others (Defendant): Partial compliance orderedFirst week of trial dates vacated; new directions issued with 'unless' orders.
6	PT Makindo v Aperchance: Contempt of Court for Misleading Advertisements 04 Aug 2010 PT Makindo (formerly known as PT Makindo TBK) (Applicant)Lost	04 Aug 2010	PT Makindo (formerly known as PT Makindo TBK) (Applicant): Application dismissedThe applicant's application for an order that the 1st respondent be fined for contempt of court was dismissed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
7	Low Tuck Kwong v Sukamto Sia: Defamation, Malicious Falsehood & Coal Mining Arrangement Dispute 24 May 2010 Sukamto Sia (Defendant, Appellant)Won	24 May 2010	Sukamto Sia (Defendant, Appellant): Counterclaim Allowed to ProceedThe defendant's counterclaim was allowed to proceed to trial.
8	Low Tuck Kwong v Sia Sukamto: Defamation Claim & Amendment of Defence 23 Jun 2009 Sia Sukamto (Defendant, Respondent)Won	23 Jun 2009	Sia Sukamto (Defendant, Respondent): Leave to Amend Defence GrantedLeave to amend the Defence to include defences of justification and qualified privilege under Singapore law was granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Holcim v Kwan Yong: Force Majeure & Economic Duress in Concrete Supply Contract 10 Dec 2008 Holcim (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	10 Dec 2008	Holcim (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment awarded to the plaintiff for $305,153.40 with interest and costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Alliance Management SA v Pendleton Lane P: Striking Out Defence for Non-Compliance with Discovery Orders 02 Jun 2008 Newfirst Limited (Defendant)Lost	02 Jun 2008	Newfirst Limited (Defendant): Defence struck outThe defendant's defence was struck out.
11	Wong Kok Yee v Ng Ming San: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance 13 Jan 2008 Wong Kok Yee (Petitioner)Won	13 Jan 2008	Wong Kok Yee (Petitioner): Claim AllowedThe court disallowed the respondent’s claim for a share in the Moonbeam property, ordered each party to retain assets in their sole name, and made no order for maintenance.
12	Alliance Management SA v Pendleton Lane P: Discovery, Production of Documents & Inspection 21 Aug 2007 Newfirst Limited (Defendant)Lost	21 Aug 2007	Newfirst Limited (Defendant): Appeal Dismissed for the most partAppeal dismissed for the most part and costs fixed at $10,000 with disbursements to be taxed, if parties were unable to agree on the quantum of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Wong David H v Timothy Seow Group Architects: Extension of Time to Appeal Liquidator's Debt Rejection 04 Jul 2007 Timothy Seow (Defendant)Won	04 Jul 2007	Timothy Seow (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's application was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Philippine Gov't v PIATCO: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Airport Terminal Construction Dispute 16 Nov 2006 Government of the Republic of the Philippines (Applicant)Lost	16 Nov 2006	Government of the Republic of the Philippines (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the partial arbitral award was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Teo Chin Kiang Willie v MAE Engineering Ltd: Unlawful Termination, Breach of Contract, Director's Duties, and Negligence Claims 28 Jun 2006 MAE Engineering Ltd (Defendant)Lost	28 Jun 2006	MAE Engineering Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Yap Jeffery Henry v Seow Timothy: Conspiracy to Defraud & Breach of Companies Act 17 Jan 2006 Lim Kim Soon (Defendant)Neutral	17 Jan 2006	Lim Kim Soon (Defendant): NeutralThe fifth defendant must bear his own costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Castello Ana Paula Costa Fusillier v Lobo Carlos Manuel Rosado: Divorce Based on Unreasonable Behaviour 23 Sep 2003 Lobo Carlos Manuel Rosado (Respondent)Won	23 Sep 2003	Lobo Carlos Manuel Rosado (Respondent): Cross-Petition GrantedThe husband's cross-petition for divorce was granted.
18	Koh Ewe Chee v Koh Hua Leong: Partnership Dispute & Property Ownership 10 Feb 2003 Koh Yew Huat (Defendant)Won	10 Feb 2003	Koh Yew Huat (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant. The court determined that Sin Wah Seng was a partnership with three equal partners and the properties in dispute were partnership assets to be shared equally, with a credit to the Plaintiff for lottery winnings used for renovations on one property. Costs awarded to the Defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Appeal Against Subpoena in Estate Assets Inquiry 28 Oct 2002 Tay Swee Sze (Appellant)Lost	28 Oct 2002	Tay Swee Sze (Appellant): Appeal dismissedMr. Tay's appeal against the subpoena was dismissed.