Chang Chee Jun

Chang Chee Jun is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in agency law and civil practice. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and appellate practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Leave	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chang Chee Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chang Chee Jun has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Fullerton Law Chambers LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	Commodities Intelligence Centre Pte Ltd v Mako International Trd Pte Ltd: Agency, Fiduciary Duties & Contractual Disputes(May 2022) Commodities Intelligence Centre v Hoi Suen Logistics: Appeal on Setting Aside Order to Enforce Arbitral Award(Nov 2021) Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Raffles Town Club Dispute over Company Act s216A and Appeal Leave(Jul 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chang Chee Jun's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.5 parties avg	3.5	75%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chang Chee Jun's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	52,000.00	13,000.004 cases	4
USD	10,281.43	10,281.431 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Commodities Intelligence Centre Pte Ltd v Mako International Trd Pte Ltd: Agency, Fiduciary Duties & Contractual Disputes 30 May 2022 Chua Yi Yang (Defendant)Lost	30 May 2022	Chua Yi Yang (Defendant): Claim DismissedAll causes of action are dismissed.
2	Commodities Intelligence Centre v Hoi Suen Logistics: Appeal on Setting Aside Order to Enforce Arbitral Award 29 Nov 2021 Hoi Suen Logistics (HK) Ltd (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2021	Hoi Suen Logistics (HK) Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file notice of appeal dismissed with costs to the respondent fixed at $12,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Raffles Town Club Dispute over Company Act s216A and Appeal Leave 01 Jul 2021 Lin Jianwei (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	01 Jul 2021	Lin Jianwei (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedLin's appeals were dismissed, and he was ordered to pay Tung $40,000 in costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Application for Leave to Appeal Decision on Reimbursement of Legal Fees 25 Oct 2020 Lin Jianwei (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Oct 2020	Lin Jianwei (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for a declaration that he does not require leave to appeal against the decision in Summons No 1281 of 2020 was dismissed. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.