Charis Tan En Pin

Charis Tan En Pin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and criminal law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admission of Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shares Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Policy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Cash Back Arrangement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
False Claim	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Charis Tan En Pin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Charis Tan En Pin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	50% of cases	Bachoo Mohan Singh v PP: Abetting False Claim, Cash Back Scheme, Lawyer's Knowledge(May 2009)
Chambers of Michael Hwang SC	1 cases	50% of cases	Tjong Very Sumito v Antig Investments: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act(Aug 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Charis Tan En Pin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Charis Tan En Pin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tjong Very Sumito v Antig Investments: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act 25 Aug 2009 Antig Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	25 Aug 2009	Antig Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with indemnity costs.
2	Bachoo Mohan Singh v PP: Abetting False Claim, Cash Back Scheme, Lawyer's Knowledge 24 May 2009 Bachoo Mohan Singh (Appellant)Lost	24 May 2009	Bachoo Mohan Singh (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissedAppeal against conviction dismissed.