Charlene Tay

Charlene Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and employment of foreign manpower act. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Charlene Tay has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	4 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Manpower Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Familial Rape	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Irregularities in proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Defective consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Curative powers of court	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault by penetration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Forensic Science	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Charlene Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Charlene Tay has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	50% of cases	Eu Lim Hoklai v Public Prosecutor: Culpable Homicide, Sudden Fight, and Provocation(Apr 2011) Public Prosecutor v UI: Sentencing for Rape of a Minor & Use of Sentencing Precedents(Aug 2008)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	1 cases	25% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Ramalingam Ravinthran: Trafficking in Cannabis and Cannabis Mixture(Nov 2009)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	1 cases	25% of cases	Wang Yuming v Public Prosecutor: Employment of Foreign Workers Act Violation(Mar 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Charlene Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Charlene Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Eu Lim Hoklai v Public Prosecutor: Culpable Homicide, Sudden Fight, and Provocation 11 Apr 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	11 Apr 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the initial conviction of murder was overturned.
2	Wang Yuming v Public Prosecutor: Employment of Foreign Workers Act Violation 14 Mar 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	14 Mar 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially allowedSentence of imprisonment varied from a total of twelve months to eight months.
3	Public Prosecutor v Ramalingam Ravinthran: Trafficking in Cannabis and Cannabis Mixture 24 Nov 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	24 Nov 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): WonAccused found guilty and convicted on two charges; death sentence imposed for each charge.
4	Public Prosecutor v UI: Sentencing for Rape of a Minor & Use of Sentencing Precedents 04 Aug 2008 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	04 Aug 2008	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was increased.