Charles Lin Ming Khin

Charles Lin Ming Khin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and medical malpractice. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Informed consent	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Freight Forwarding	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pure Economic Loss	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Transportation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Patient Confidentiality	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Charles Lin Ming Khin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Charles Lin Ming Khin has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Donaldson and Burkinshaw	3 cases	60% of cases	Smart Modular Technologies v Federal Express: Contract of Carriage & Bailment Dispute(Jun 2004) Man B and W Diesel v PT Bumi: Indemnity Costs & Offer to Settle Dispute(May 2004) Man B&W Diesel v PT Bumi: Negligence, Economic Loss & Subcontractor Liability in Shipbuilding Contract(Mar 2004)
Charles Lin LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Sheng Ling Huo v Orthosports@Novena: Medical Negligence and Informed Consent in Knee Replacement Surgery(Jul 2022)
Donaldson & Burkinshaw	1 cases	20% of cases	Dr Eric Gan v SMC: Negligence in Post-operative Care After ERCP Procedure(Oct 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Charles Lin Ming Khin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.7 parties avg	2.7	40%
Won	33.5 parties avg	3.5	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Charles Lin Ming Khin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sheng Ling Huo v Orthosports@Novena: Medical Negligence and Informed Consent in Knee Replacement Surgery 11 Jul 2022 Ang Kian Chuan (Respondent)Won	11 Jul 2022	Ang Kian Chuan (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Dr Eric Gan v SMC: Negligence in Post-operative Care After ERCP Procedure 31 Oct 2010 Dr Eric Gan Keng Seng (Appellant)Lost	31 Oct 2010	Dr Eric Gan Keng Seng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of the Disciplinary Committee dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Smart Modular Technologies v Federal Express: Contract of Carriage & Bailment Dispute 28 Jun 2004 Federal Express (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 Jun 2004	Federal Express (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; Sun Tech's claim dismissed with costs.
4	Man B and W Diesel v PT Bumi: Indemnity Costs & Offer to Settle Dispute 18 May 2004 Mirrlees Blackstone Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	18 May 2004	Mirrlees Blackstone Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Indemnity costs not grantedThe court did not grant the appellant's request for indemnity costs.
5	Man B&W Diesel v PT Bumi: Negligence, Economic Loss & Subcontractor Liability in Shipbuilding Contract 08 Mar 2004 Mirrlees Blackstone Ltd (Appellant)Won	08 Mar 2004	Mirrlees Blackstone Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs of both appeals and costs below awarded to Mirrlees Blackstone Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).